From Michael Geist:
What Lies Behind Bell’s Radical Plan to Raise TV Fees, Block Content, Violate Net Neutrality & Fight Netflix
While Crull argued that Bell doesn’t want protection (in fact, incredibly claimed that a company that has benefited from foreign investment restrictions, genre protection, and simultaneous substitution has never had protection), he proceeded to outline a series of radical reforms that would raise television fees, block access to U.S. channels, violate net neutrality rules, and make Netflix less attractive to consumers.
Couched in terms of “level playing fields” and “secure rights markets”, the speech was fundamentally an admission that given the competitive challenges, Bell’s hope is for a regulatory overhaul. Continue reading.
Latest posts by Greg David (see all)
- Preview: Growing Sense adds gardening to AMI’s stable of original programs - March 19, 2018
- Caught: Enuka Okuma discusses the “very modern character” of K.C. - March 19, 2018
- Link: Ottawa comic Mike MacDonald dead at 63 - March 18, 2018