Everything about Featured, eh?

WGC Award nominee Matt Watts on Michael: Tuesdays & Thursdays’ “Bridges”

BL02 DAY08 2604

Leading up to the Writers Guild of Canada awards on April 23, TV, eh? is posting a series of interviews with some of nominees. Matt Watts was nominated in the Comedy category for the “Bridges” episode of Michael: Tuesdays & Thursdays.

Can you describe the episode, and how it fit into the Michael: Tuesdays & Thursdays season?

“Episode 5: Bridges” is the first episode where the season arc really kicks in. At the beginning of the episode, David realizes that he’s allowed his patient, Michael, to become too dependent on him and tries to make the relationship more professional by putting some distance between them. As a result, Michael feels he’s being pushed away, and reacts badly. This forces David to tell Michael the big truth: that he’s been writing a book about him without his knowledge or consent. It’s a huge turning point in the season.

What about this episode are you particularly proud of?

It went through so many drafts. For a brief period, the script was about clothing, and Michael’s inability to remove his hoodie and toque (to tie in more with the b-plot where Michael and Claire are having sexual difficulties) and the exposure scenes had Michael and David in a crowded bar wearing short-shorts. No, really.

There’s so much going on in that episode, I didn’t think we’d be able to pull it off – but we did (Allison MacLean did an amazing job directing it) and we were all involved in it. Don (McKellar) oversaw everything, Bob (Martin) did a pass on it before I did my final pass (and then went back to Bob for the production drafts – as do all the scripts) and it ultimately turned out to be one of my favourite episodes of the season. So yeah, I’m proud of that… That we pulled it off. Although my name is on this script, it was a group effort, it was a monster.

What does this recognition mean to you?

I’ve had such a crazy, fortunate career, meeting these guys when I was really young. They took me under their wing when I was 20 and have included me in so many of their projects, but this is the first time I’ve had a “written by” credit on one of them. It means a lot to me, but it also means a lot to Bob and Don; they’ve told me they’re really proud of me, and this nomination. So that means the world. It’s been a long time that I’ve been vying for their approval. Whether I win or not, I have it. Now I can die.

And finally (imagine my best Joan Rivers impression): what will you be wearing to the ceremony?

Whatever I wear it’ll have to look decent no matter how much alcohol is spilled on it.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Endgame & Heartland actor Torrance Coombs on the business of deception and those eyes

TC

With roles in jPod, Heartland, The Tudors and Endgame, Vancouver actor Torrance Coombs has become a familiar face — with stunningly recognizable eyes — in the Canadian television industry. He answered TV, eh?‘s questions about his career, his Internet following, and the chaos of pilot season in Los Angeles.

I’ll start with the hard-hitting question — did that cool actorly name destine you to be an actor? Assuming not, though, how did you get into acting?

I was actually going to be named Tory, but my mom thought I should have a more formal sounding name in case I got into politics. That didn’t happen. Although I guess acting is somewhat like politics. We’re all in the business of deception.

I got into acting through school choir, doing a couple of musicals. But I didn’t really start to take it seriously until Sally, my high school drama teacher, recruited me for the theatre company. I really connected to the other weirdos in the program and found a real passion for it during long rehearsals. I ended up in theatre school in university and now here I am.

With jPod, Heartland, The Tudors and Endgame you’ve had some diverse roles. What do you think your strengths are as an actor?

Let’s be honest here, I owe an awful lot to my eyes. They’re a feature that allows me to stand out in a group of relatively comparable actors. My other biggest strength I’d say is my diversity. I’ve played geeks, bad boys, cowboys, rapists, murderers. Sexy and unsexy. On the one hand it’s an advantage, because I’m in the mix for a lot of different roles. On the other hand, I think it takes a little longer for a guy like me to establish an identity, because I’m not the guy who immediately springs to mind for any one particular type of role.

What’s been a career highlight so far?

jPod was an early highlight. Most of the cast of that show are still dear friends of mine. I don’t think I’ve ever laughed so hard so consistently in my life as I did on that set every day. The Tudors was another highlight, and in every sense has changed my life. It’s the meatiest role I’ve had the chance to play. It’s also pretty hard to beat shooting on location in Ireland. I really felt a connection to the country and the people there.

jPod had a devoted online following, as well as Endgame, which gained new fans through Hulu. How does that kind of Internet fan base help a show?

The jury’s still out on how much it’s helped either of those shows. But from my perspective, it’s a great way to connect with the audience. TV lacks the immediacy of theatre. It’s hard sometimes to know whether people are actually watching, or what they might be thinking about your work. The feedback at times can be devastating, but mostly it’s really lovely.

How much hope do you have that Endgame could get a second season based on the Hulu success? (And if it did, would it end up as a web exclusive series?)

The word on the street is that there is a decent possibility of more Endgame getting made. Without any knowledge of what’s going on behind closed doors, I can’t say how close it is to happening. My understanding is that if it does return, it will also return to TV on Showcase in Canada.

You’ve been in LA during pilot season – what’s that process like? How does it differ from your experience in the Canadian TV market?

Quite frankly, it’s chaos. I’ve never actually booked a pilot during pilot season. I seem to have much more luck in the off-season. There’s something about the pressure and intensity that isn’t conducive to doing your best work. The process is similar to what happens in Canada, there’s just a lot more people doing it. It can psych you out a bit because you can see what you’re up against and how terribly the odds are stacked against you. I prefer being blissfully unaware of the odds. It frees me to just do the work and hope for the best.

What’s next for you?

I’m going back to Banff to finish shooting a movie I started on last year called Drawing Home, about Peter and Catharine Whyte. Other than that, nothing concrete, but a lot of pokers in the fire.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

WGC Award nominee Evan Thaler Hickey on Connor Undercover’s “Escape Artist”

ETH-Headshot

Leading up to the Writers Guild of Canada awards on April 23, TV, eh? is posting a series of interviews with some of nominees. Evan Thaler Hickey was nominated in the Children & Youth category for the “Escape Artist” episode of Connor Undercover.

Can you describe the episode, and how it fit into the Connor Undercover season?

Let’s see if I can do this without being too spoiler-y! “Escape Artist” is one of the hinge episodes in Connor’s second season. Up to that point, Connor (our secret agent in training) and Gisela (his protectee) have been working to keep Gisela safe from a faceless adversary bent on capturing her (for what reason, no one knows!). But now, there’s a new player in town who knows who’s behind the entire conspiracy; and he’s playing a major game of cat and mouse with our two heroes as they try to capture him. Oh, and Connor and Gisela are handcuffed together the entire time. It’s a crazy thrill ride and it gives them a big clue into who the big bad of the series is.

What about this episode are you particularly proud of?

I think it’s the overall tone of the episode. Connor’s an action/adventure/comedy and the episodes sort of live or die on finding the right balance between those elements. It’s gotta be funny but not too jokey ’cause that kills the tension and the stakes have to be high but not life-threatening since it’s a kids’ show. I’d already worked on the first season of the series but writing this episode was the first time I felt I really got that. It felt good.

What does this recognition mean to you?

This is really big for me — not just because it’s the first industry award I’ve ever been nominated for but because this award’s all about writers judging writers on their writing. It’s not about what made it to the screen, it’s about the script you wrote and I think that makes it mean more than just about any other award out there. Plus, it’s made my mom really happy.

And finally (imagine my best Joan Rivers impression): what will you be wearing to the ceremony?

A look of anxiety and lots of deodorant.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

WGC Award nominee Ken Cuperus on My Babysitter’s A Vampire’s “Blood Drive”

Leading up to the Writers Guild of Canada awards on April 23, TV, eh? is posting a series of interviews with some of nominees. Ken Cuperus earned one of  three nominations for My Babysitter’s a Vampire in the Children and Youth category, for the “Blood Drive” episode.

Can you describe the episode, and how it fit into the My Babysitter’s a Vampire season?

“Blood Drive” takes place early in the season as Sarah struggles to keep herself from drinking blood, which would turn her from a fledgling into a full vampire. But temptation comes knocking in the form of a school blood drive, and Erica is piling on the peer pressure to get Sarah to drink. Everything gets more complicated when it is revealed that the two nurses who are running the blood drive are, in fact, vampires themselves… and the blood drive is a long-running scam to stock up on fresh blood. Rory and Erica try to steal the blood from the blood truck, but get captured by the vamp nurses — and Ethan, Benny and Sarah are forced to give chase, to rescue their pals. That’s where the title comes from. It’s a blood drive … but also they are driving in a blood truck. Forget the script, the title alone is award worthy, right? (crickets)

What about this episode are you particularly proud of?

Did I mention how clever the title is? I mean, it’s a blood drive, right? But also … there’s the driving of a truck that contains actual blood. Rarely is an episode as aptly titled as this one. Also, I managed to cram in a “Sarlacc Pit” reference, which will be mildly interesting to Star Wars fans and nobody else.

What does this recognition mean to you?

It’s really great to have my work recognized, and I love that I am up against some of my favourite people in the industry. I’ve been working alongside both Ben and Alice since my earliest days as a preschool writer, and I would be thrilled to see either one of them take home the award. I don’t know Evan, but I have no doubt he is equally deserving, and I’m rooting for him as well. Of course, if I do win, I will rub it in all of their faces mercilessly.

And finally (imagine my best Joan Rivers impression): what will you be wearing to the ceremony?

Probably the same outfit I wear to every single event ever. I mean, I own maybe three pairs of pants. And my “good” shirt has holes in the sleeves. I’m not what you’d call a sharp dresser. If it wasn’t for my wife, I’d probably just show up in my pajamas. I have serious issues.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Marketplace’s Erica & Tom face a TV, eh? “investigation”

Marketplace ends a stellar season this Friday, having averaged 1.2 million viewers on Friday nights, a 31% increase over last year, and hitting a nerve with stories on hospital infections and expensive eyeglasses, among others. Hosts Erica Johnson and Tom Harrington answered some questions for TV, eh? about the show and its influence, some of their favourite segments, and how we can make smarter consumer choices.

How does a show come together? Tell us a bit about the team behind the hosts.

ERICA: Marketplace is definitely a strong “team” show. Tom and I are who the public sees (and gets to know), but we’re strongly supported by tenacious researchers, creative producers, associate producers, editors and cameramen.  We have regular story meetings where we toss around program ideas – what’s on people’s minds, what stories do we think need telling, and – given that our show airs Friday night – what will people find interesting in that timeslot.  We also get a lot of ideas from viewers, and often include them in our stories. Because people know that our show advocates on their behalf, our viewers are really engaged – they tell us what they like, and what they don’t like – and all of it’s good to hear (though the good stuff is better!). 

TOM: We work on many of our stories for months, most of them for weeks. Our producers and researchers do a great deal of the heavy research though Erica and I chip in when called upon. In my brief time on Marketplace, I’m continually impressed by what we uncover and by the creative vision of our producers who have such terrific ideas on how to present the material. Add to that the editors and videographers who deliver the look and feel. We tell great stories that are also great looking stories.  

What was your favourite Marketplace story to do and why? Which do you think was the most important?

ERICA: That’s a hard question to answer after ten years of hosting!  A few seasons back, Marketplace travelled to Budapest, Hungary to interview a cross-dressing inventor who claimed his miracle device could cure cancer.  That was a great story to work on for a number of reasons – it featured a colourful central character, to be sure, but was also a story that was having a profound impact on people who believed his spiel, paid thousands for his device, and put their health at risk. I’ll never forget the inventor pointing to a gun (we think it was fake) at the start of the interview and saying, “I hope I don’t have to use that.”  After our story aired, Health Canada pulled the license for the “miracle device” so it can’t be sold here anymore.

In terms of which story was the most important … that’s also difficult to answer. A lot of the stories we do have an impact on people’s lives — and when we’re lucky, they change corporate and public policy. Just last week we aired “Dirty Hospitals” and I would say that’s one of my favourites. The piece is about the number of people in Canada who go to hospital and pick up a potentially deadly superbug. It’s unbelievable to me that more than 12,000 people can die from a hospital acquired infection in Canada — more per capita than any other developed country. And because a good friend became very sick from MRSA she got in the hospital, and another friend’s mother died from c. difficile she got in the hospital, this story meant a lot to me. We tested hospital cleaning in BC and Ontario, and each hospital got a failing grade. My hope is that hospital administrators sit up and finally do what’s needed to stem the tide of people dying needlessly from hospital acquired infections.

TOM: It’s hard to pick a favourite and it’s been only two seasons for me but I did enjoy our story on one of Canada’s biggest residential landlords called “Trouble For Rent.” It was a classic example of Marketplace defending the powerless, tenants living in squalid conditions and unable to effect change. But our intervention help improve the situation for some and brought public attention on the company’s way of doing business across Canada. I think in terms of importance, the story on the cost of glasses (“Framed”) had a high impact. We received huge ratings, tons of viewer reaction and even support from within the eyeglass industry. It’s an issue that meant more to Canadians than we realized.

What kinds of positive regulatory or other changes have you seen result from the show?

ERICA: We know that officials in Ontario’s Ministry of Health watched “Dirty Hospitals” and that night told the union representing hospital cleaners that hospitals in the Niagara Region (where there’ve been numerous c. difficile outbreaks) will end their relationship with a private cleaning company. Frontline workers had complained about the private company cutting staff and using cheaper cleaning products than necessary during outbreaks. Another story, “Dirty Doctors,” documented doctors not washing their hands as they moved from contagious patient to patient. That story is now played in several medical schools as a teaching tool, and used by hospitals across the country.

We’ve had Health Canada pull the license on shady medical devices (like the “cancer-curing” device, mentioned above), we’ve had companies change misleading labels (as Maple Leaf did last month after we revealed they weren’t being forthright about nitrites in their deli meat), and we’ve seen municipalities ban toxic lawn fertilizers because of our work. Marketplace is a hugely gratifying show to work on, and both Tom and I feel lucky to be involved in a program that still sticks up for the little guy.

TOM: In the glasses story, viewers told us that BC opticians were charging $50 for a particular measurement which was supposed to be free there. A follow up story revealed what they were doing and the rules were enforced. In the apartment story, the company replaced the roof on the building where one of our victims lived. The company’s stock dropped in value for several days after our report.

How do you deal with negative reaction from those featured on the program, or viewers who object to your conclusions?

ERICA: I don’t get too upset if someone we’ve asked hard questions of, doesn’t like it. Because our research is so solid, charges we put to someone are rooted in fact. Doing investigative journalism doesn’t always make you popular with the bad guys, but it sure builds strong public support (and on days a company is threatening to sue us – we really appreciate that support!).  We get emails and phone calls daily from people who believe in what we do, and that’s really gratifying. We also hear from viewers who don’t agree with our conclusions, and that’s to be expected.  Our hope is that viewers see that we’re doing our best to tell an accurate story, and expose wrong-doing.  Some viewers want us to tell more “good news” stories – but so little investigative journalism exists these days (it’s costly, time-consuming) that we’re pretty protective of our brand.

TOM: You soon understand that doing this kind of journalism will anger those we focus on and we can’t please everyone. But the show has incredible and overwhelming popular support. So many Canadians e-mail every day because they tell us they believe in what we do and hope we can help them. That’s why so many of our story ideas come from viewers. What in find interesting is that many businesses are becoming more aggressive and creative in their responses to our reports which could be a story in itself.

Sometimes it seems like we need a PhD in consumerism to make smart choices – besides watching Marketplace, based on your research do you have tips on what consumers can do to make informed choices without being overwhelmed?

ERICA: I think most people know how to make good, informed consumer choices – it’s just surprising that so often we don’t use the knowledge we have!  Can’t say enough “if it seems too good to be true, it probably is” – that’s a good way to get burned. Do your research before you sign up for (insert here: a gym membership, timeshare, new car…). What do friends and family say about their experience with that company? That product?  What are people saying online?  Consumers have so many more resources available to them now than even 10 years ago, and can use them for research – social media, chat rooms and websites.  Trust your instincts, too. If a salesperson is giving you the heebie jeebies, run – don’t walk – away as fast as you can. Sadly, there are a lot of people trying to make a buck at consumers’ expense – that’s why at Marketplace “We’ve Got Your Back.”  (Yep – that’s our show slogan.  Busted.)

TOM: I have to admit to being much like that before I joined the show. What this talented team has taught me is to read labels, read fine print, resist phone solicitation and door-to-door as well. Rely on the word of friends and colleagues to determine whether a service or business is reliable. If someone really wants your business, they’ll answer your questions and listen to our complaints. If they’re not interested, then you know you should take your business somewhere else.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail