All posts by Diane Wild

Diane is the founder of TV, eh? She loves books, movies, TV, science, space, traveling, theatre, art, cats, and drinking multiple beverages at the same time.

Oh Baby Beluga in the deep tea-coloured river

There’s a moment in tonight’s The Nature of Things documentary, “Call of the Baby Beluga,” when a researcher involved in studying and protecting the remaining wild belugas in the St. Lawrence chokes up. “Is there a safe place anywhere on the earth for a little lost whale? And then the larger question: is there a safe place on the earth for 900 of them? I really want to believe …”

Husband and wife directing team Suzanne Chisholm and Michael Parfit of Mountainside Films (of Saving Luna fame) use the emotional story of a stranded baby beluga to tell that larger story. A group of scientists, drawing on their knowledge and their humanity, are determined to save Baby by putting it in the path of wild females who could adopt it.  The larger question is whether our knowledge of animal behaviour can help us protect our natural world.

Parfit points out  the scientists involved in protecting the whales may not see the ultimate results of their efforts until “long after their professional careers are over — in some cases long after their lives are over. They are devoted to something that feels like it matters. That’s the story of the little whale. They know they themselves will probably not know how it turns out.”

“With all these issues we’re facing with the planet, we’re doing for the next generations.”

The directors incorporated older footage of Baby’s story that had been filmed by the scientists involved, and captured some stunning new footage, including drone shots showing the whales in action from above.

Suzanne Chisholm-Michael ParfitWhenever they could fit on board, co-directors Chisholm and Parfit would hop on the researchers’ boats. Occasionally it was Parfit with his  son David, who composed the film’s music and acted as official drone catcher. “That’s an anxious endeavour,” dad Michael says.

Their little drone would fly over the belugas, capturing the footage from a perspective even the scientists hadn’t seen, and then “David would catch it. He almost got scalped once.”

Parfit  explains that the usual underwater footage is captured by a diver, so “the beluga behaviour is related to what the diver is doing. And if the whale decides to leave in a hurry, you can’t follow.”

Thanks in part to the drone, then, the documentary shows in remarkable visual detail how belugas are tactile and social creatures, constantly touching and turning towards each other,  with strong bonds between groups of males and “alloparenting” among mothers who share parenting duties for sometimes unrelated calves.

While the scientists worked together to try to use that alloparenting trait to Baby’s advantage, the filmmakers used the little one’s story partly to show, in Chisholm’s words, “what we can do as humans and a society to make the world a better place, not just  for belugas in the St. Lawrence but for the animals we share the world with.”

Where once there were about 10,000 belugas in the area, hunting, pollution and environmental changes have seen those numbers dwindle over the past  several decades to 900.  But thanks to  scientific research into issues such as how sound from ferries and boats affects the whales, steps to protect them have been implemented.

“The coolest thing for me was seeing how in my lifetime, the human attitude toward belugas has changed,” says Chisholm. “People love these whales – our whole relationship with them has evolved. You think of that little baby, 30-40 years ago people would have left her to die.”

“Call of the Baby Beluga” airs Thursday, January 28 on CBC’s The Nature of Things.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Hidden gems of the Canadian Screen Awards

The Canadian Screen Awards (aka CSAs aka Screenies aka#CdnScreen16 aka give the damn things an official nickname, would you?) were announced yesterday.

In one of the worst-designed websites you’ll find this side of GeoCities, the Academy helpfully tells us which awards we should care most about by selecting them for an easier to navigate “Selected Awards” television page. They think I’m more interested in Best Local News Anchor than any of the screenwriting awards? Don’t they know me at all?  After combing through a 55-page PDF of the complete television nominees I’ve found some gems and head-scratchers.

Favourite head-to-head match-up

Dan Levy versus dad Eugene Levy, both of Schitt’s Creek, as best actor in a comedy? Bring on the battle of the eyebrows. Eugene has the Canadian comedic royalty history but Dan’s portrayal of selfish, oblivious, vulnerable David won my heart and my funny bone. Both could be winners as producers, since Schitt’s Creek is up for best comedy, and Dan has one of two writing nominations for the series, which garnered a whopping 14 TV nominations (and one for digital).

Helen Shaver should direct everything

She has two of the five nominations for best direction in a drama, for two different series: Vikings and Orphan Black. Which also seem to me two of the most complicated series to direct, what with the multiple clones played by one person and the swashbuckling Vikings.

There’s a fine line

Still Standing, with comedian Jonny Harris touring the country doing standup and finding laughs and poignancy in small town Canada is most reminiscent of the Rick Mercer Report to me, yet they are in different categories: best factual program for Still Standing, best variety or sketch for Mercer. It both makes sense — Still Standing skews towards learning about the places he visits, Mercer skews more toward sketch, and yet illustrates the difficulty of categorization, especially for awards that have 55 PDF pages of categories to choose from.

I do not think that word means what you think it means

Bitten received two nominations, one for music and another for “best achievement in casting.” Yet none of the cast, including guest roles, was nominated. I wouldn’t take anything away from Bitten but one of the few nominations Schitt’s Creek did not get was casting, though nearly its entire cast was nominated.

Moment of panic

No This Life or Romeo Section? The Canadian Screen Award eligibility period for television is from September 1, 2014 to August 31, 2015, so they won’t be able to enter until next year.  That five month gap between the period’s end and the nomination announcement — which expands to seven months until the awards are handed out — primes the Screenies to regularly honour already cancelled shows long after they last aired.

Speaking of cancelled series …

Strange Empire‘s Aaron Poole is deservedly up for best dramatic actor, and Woody Jeffreys for supporting in the same series. Blackstone has one last shot as best drama, an award its been nominated for before but has never taken home.

That said … holy 19-2

The Bravo series will be hard to beat, with 12 nominations including best drama series. Orphan Black has 13 nods but best drama series isn’t one of them (two of them are best writing for a drama series, though).

Canadian rules

Best international drama was added to  the Gemini Awards — the TV awards that merged with the Genies to create the Canadian Screen Awards — in 2012.  The perception was that international coproductions such as The Tudors and The Borgias had an unfair advantage over purely homegrown productions and naming them best Canadian drama was an embarrassment. Lately it’s the international drama category itself that’s an embarrassment, with only Vikings and Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell earning nominations this year. With two contenders, why bother? I’d put my money on 19-2 over those two any day. And yet, this category made the Academy’s “Selected Awards” cut.

Tune in March 13 on CBC to see Norm Macdonald preside over the televised portion of the ceremony.

 

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Dr. Jennifer Gardy, weather mythbuster

Who has seen the wind? Dr. Jennifer Gardy, that’s who.

In the name of science — and her hosting role in tonight’s The Nature of Things — she steps into the eye of a (man-made) tornado, winds swirling around her, to discover whether a highway overpass is a safe place to hide. She also investigates if a plane would survive a lightning strike and if snow is really white.

For the episode “Myth or Science: In the Eye of the Storm,” Vancouver resident Gardy also travelled to Manchester to study rain, which seems like travelling from Edmonton to Anchorage to study snow, but that’s a perk of the gig:  visiting experts wherever they are in order to get answers.

“We follow the science, and more importantly we follow the scientists themselves,” says Gardy, explaining they want to capture the thought process of those scientists who were integral to deepening our understanding of the science behind weather phenomena.

Ironically Manchester – the Vancouver of the UK in terms of rain – was dry for all but about an hour during the six days the crew was filming there.

For one crucial shot, Gardy stood  in an alley while the director stood on a railway bridge above with a watering can. For others,  they desperately drove around Manchester in a van chasing the rain.  “As soon as it would start raining we’d slam the brakes on, throw open the door, everyone would run out onto the street and we’d get set up and get the shot, praying it would rain long enough for us to get a single take.”

That segment brought her the biggest surprise. “If you ask a child to draw a raindrop, or you ask an adult to draw a raindrop, they’ll draw that teardrop shape,” she says. “We’ve been lied to all these years.  The outline of a raindrop is more like a flattened out hamburger.”

Gardy is a researcher herself, with a day job studying the genome of infectious diseases with the BC Centre for Disease Control — a growth industry, you have to think, given the rise of superbugs.  She jokingly compares her methods to CSI, except it’s Cootie Scene Investigation.  “I try to find out from clues left in an organism’s genome things like where did that pathogen come from, how did it suddenly jump into this population, how did it cause this outbreak, how did it infect person A who infected B who infected C.”

Gardy2

Given that background, how does she approach her The Nature of Things segments knowing the audience is coming in without her background knowledge of the scientific process and the science itself? She says it’s important to consider the narrative arc they want the story to take before filming, and put on her “naive-to-the-subject-matter hat” when questioning the experts.

Gardy is a passionate communicator on and off-screen, melding her loves of performing and science.  “The biggest thing we can do as scientists is to communicate our work to the public,” she says. “The simplest reason is that we are obliged to.”

She points out much of the research being done in Canada is publicly funded. “The happy side effect of communicating that is the public realizes just how much it surrounds us in our everyday lives. People develop a greater appreciation for science and a greater appreciation for the role it plays in society.”

She points to the last election where people may not have been swayed by the science issue alone but “packaged with a bunch of other sweeping changes you have people saying wow, I’m really excited to support a government that supports science.”

That in turn creates a better climate for researchers active today and “more importantly, for the researchers of tomorrow. You can show kids that science is everywhere. Science isn’t a guy with crazy white hair and a lab coat with beakers full of coloured liquids.”

“Science is people who look like you and me. We come in every gender, we come in every colour, we come in every shape and size, we come in every research domain.”

“Science is all about thinking and observing and being curious. If we can raise a generation who keeps that curiosity and recognizes that everyone can be a scientist, we’ll get an awesome next generation.”

“Myth or Science: In the Eye of the Storm” airs tonight on CBC’s The Nature of Things.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Link: Saving Hope’s Stacey Farber on Sydney’s journey

From Christy Spratlin of TV Junkies:

Saving Hope’s Stacey Farber on Sydney’s journey and her relationship with Maggie
A bombing and a common patient has brought Sydney back to Hope Zion and we at The TV Junkies, along with viewers, are eagerly anticipating Farber’s return. We recently had a chance to talk with her about Sydney’s journey last season and about what’s to come on this week’s episode. Continue reading.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail