Everything about Featured, eh?

Interview: Luke Macfarlane on comedy, sex and getting Satisfaction

LukeM

By Adam Langton for TV, eh?

Tonight, CTV’s latest sitcom offering Satisfaction will be debuting at 8pm. The show stars Luke Macfarlane and Leah Renee as a loving couple, with comedian Ryan Belleville playing their best friend and roommate. As detailed in the breakdown, Satisfaction is about struggling with the next step. Whether it’s committing to a career, a relationship, or living arrangements, it’s not easy being a twenty-something when you’re torn between your immature past and your potential future. Luke Macfarlane took a few minutes out of his busy press day to chat with me about the show.

First off, I read that you’re from London, Ontario. I actually went to grad school there and I was curious: do you ever make it back for any London Knights games?

No, unfortunately not! I’ve learned a bit about hockey but was never a big hockey fan. My father worked at the University, however. He was actually the director of Student Health Services for almost twenty years.

Oh wow, good for him! Perhaps he and I crossed paths, who knows?

Well that depends, did you have any psychological counselling?

I think we’ll save that for off the record. (laughs)

(Laughs) okay!

 So with your acting background through Over There and Brothers and Sisters and your recent appearance on Person of Interest, you’re well known for your drama chops. I was wondering if switching to comedy came as a relief, or is it a challenge?

Oh it’s definitely a challenge. It was something that I really, really wanted to do. I actually had a conversation with my agent after I finished Brothers and Sisters. I said you know, when I look at the actors that I really admire, they’ve all done their time in comedy. And I really, really, really wanted to do it, so I started reading comedy scripts. I got a lot of responses with people saying “I don’t know if we think Luke is funny.” Then, it was a relief when I read this script. Not only did I think it was super, super funny, Tim (McAuliffe)’s script, but they also said “we think you’re funny too!” So it’s definitely something that is scary and a challenge and I’m learning so much. But if you’re going to stay in the business for a long time you have to be willing to do everything.

Sounds like a perfect match. So how is the tone, on set? Is it a lighter and goofier tone than you’re used to, even when you’re not actually rolling? Or is it business as usual?

It’s funny. We do laugh a lot, for sure–there’s always laughs on set, no matter what. I will say of this show, the pace at which we film is so fast. We just get through so much material. I have never worked this hard in my life, ever; the hours that I’ve been keeping… when I was doing other shows in the past, I would come in and do a couple of days a week. This is every single day at the crack of dawn. So that’s hard, but laughter is the way that we get through the day.

Tell us a little bit about Jason Howell.

Jason Howell is a PhD candidate in plant genetics … so something that’s really exciting to a lot of people, I’m sure (laughs). Tim actually intentionally wanted Tim to have a job that sounded really boring. He kind of is the nerd of the group. I’ve got this beautiful, beautiful, intelligent, quick-witted girlfriend and I think that we wanted him to be smart on the page and maybe not as smart when it came to more practical matters.

Are you an academic type, like Jason?

I do think I am a bit of a nerd, although it’s such a cliché for people to say that now. I think I am a nerd. When I was making my decision of what I wanted to do in life I had a very real interest in going into the sciences. And I applied to the Applied Sciences program at [the University of Toronto] and I also auditioned for Juilliard, and I instead went down the path of acting as I somehow got into Juilliard.

Well I was reading how during the development of Satisfaction there was a heavy emphasis on keeping Jason’s relationship with Maggie very much about love — they didn’t want their relationship to be about fighting and bickering. Is that very clear in the script or did you guys have to sort of bring that love to life while shooting?

Leah (who plays Maggie) and I get along so well, so that was really easy. And, although love is not the same as sex, when the show actually starts you find Jason and Maggie goin’ at it in a few inappropriate places in the house.

So it’s part of the struggle of living with a roommate and how you try to have a private life in the company of somebody else. So that’s definitely something present. We want to show that these guys are all really bonded in the problems that they face. It’s really easy, Leah and I get along really, really well. And they certainly write us as a very affectionate couple.

Well I think I should post this interview as fast as possible — tell people about the opening sex scene and make sure that all eyes are on CTV tonight!

I really hope so! I’m really, really optimistic and I have to say, honestly, I’ve been lucky to be a part of a lot of things but I feel so strongly about the quality of this. I’m really proud that it happens to be Canadian. I’ve always wanted to come back and work here. I am really, really proud of the show and I hope that everyone else likes it as much as I do.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Interview: Daniel Gillies on storytelling and Saving Hope

DGillies

By Adam Langton for TV, eh?

This morning I had the pleasure of chatting with Daniel Gillies, star of both Saving Hope on CTV as well as the upcoming spin-off of The Vampire Diaries, The Originals on The CW. Gillies also wrote and directed his first feature film Broken Kingdom which debuted in 2012, starringGillies and his wife, Rachael Leigh Cook. I asked Gillies about his career, his film, and Saving Hope’s Dr. Joel Goran.

Well if I’m not mistaken, I have it written here that you were born in Winnipeg, Manitoba, you moved to New Zealand at a very early age, from there you went to Australia to work, then to Los Angeles, now you’re back in Canada for Saving Hope … could you tell us a bit about that journey and becoming an actor in so many different places in your career?

You missed one important step in there: between Australia and the United States I actually went to Vancouver and worked there for a year, which is sort of what got me started in North America. That was in 2001. To be honest, it’s fascinating to me to think about how many places I’ve been to in order to have this career. I’m a very lucky guy. But to talk about the last twenty years is a little difficult in a paragraph.

(Laughs.) Absolutely. I was mostly wondering where you were and when it was that you realized acting is what you wanted to do.

You know, I didn’t really have the quote/unquote momentous insight, or the epiphany of any kind. To be honest with you man, it’s a little less romantic than that. I was never really particularly good at anything else. I ended up training at 18 or 19 in a very sort of pedestrian, common way. I ended up joining theatre groups and eventually making the jump to television; this was back in New Zealand. Eventually, before I knew it, I had been doing it for five, and then ten years. It sort of just blossomed. I always had the intention of doing what I’m doing and I think I always knew that I would write my own material as well, which I did with Broken Kingdom.

It’s funny–I wish I could answer that more succinctly so I’m not boring the people who have to read this. But also, if I could say something a lot more sensational. I think I need to start fabricating during interviews. Or at least before the interviews, a meditative strike. I’ll come in and say something about visitations from angels or something like that. But truthfully I knew I was altogether too idle to do anything blue-collar or too arduous. And I was way too drawn to storytelling to not be drawn into a creative life. I didn’t really have a moment, I was just sort of always doing this. Even as a kid, I was doing this.

So, with working on your own material, with Broken Kingdom, does that feel like a culmination of this journey?

That’s an interesting question. I think that it unifies a lot of those skills. Do I think that my movie is perfect? No, I don’t. I’m very proud of it, I think that for a first film it’s pretty damn exceptional, but do I look at it now and see flaws in it? Absolutely. I do think that [Broken Kingdom] is sort of an amalgamation of the aspects of myself that have grown over the years, creatively. It is wonderful to kind… have control, to be perfectly honest. There’s something really exciting and really intimidating about having control. When you’re able to say on a platform, through art, what you would like to say back to the universe. It’s really wonderful, there’s a great liberty in that.

And there’s so much working against you. I’m not just talking about raising the money and all of that business, which is just soul-destroying. I’m talking about the art itself. When you have the true liberty to be able to create anything, you know, whether it’s a film or whether it’s a novel or whether it’s a giant mosaic of tile, there’s so much working against you, whatever your creation is.

Ira Glass has a great take on this. There’s a thing on YouTube called “Storytelling.”

It’s a four-part thing. It’s really, really inspiring, man. He talks about being a journalist and he talks about NPR and he discusses what it is to be an artist. So when you start out there’s this ravine between who you are as an artist and who you aspire to be–the kind of art that you aspire to create. So the ravine seems sort of gigantic but over the years it sort of slowly, slowly closes. When you begin as an artist, you have a haste, you know? And you aspire to great things but when it comes to doing them it’s pretty daunting, actually.

I can’t remember where I was going with this, I’ve just gone on a complete rant, tangentially throwing you left and right, all over the place. But if you get the opportunity to watch [Storytelling] it’s really cool; I love what he says about being a storyteller and how the art is sort of devastating. Even when I look at Broken Kingdom now, I’ll still see it and think to myself “okay, those things were important to me then, and I’ve discussed them and I’ve asked a lot of questions” but I definitely know I wouldn’t do it the same way again. I feel like I’ve learned and improved so much from making Broken Kingdom. The next time around, I think, is going to be interesting. And I look forward to making thousands more mistakes in order to inch closer to saying those handful of things that you say in your life that might be significant, important.

It seems like even the most celebrated filmmakers are constantly making mistakes, so maybe it’s just part of the entire process.

I think that’s the thing, man. And the artists I admire the most are the ones who have embraced that. I’m really enjoying being in Canada now, because it’s a lot more akin to the sensibility of my New Zealand people, with regard to something like success. We look at success in the United States — I think there’s a sort of disease where success is quote/unquote “getting it right” rather than the journey being the point of it all. And I think that you sort of need to hurl yourself into the fire over and over again; those are the people that are great. Even Einstein said “it’s not that I am so smart, I have a greater threshold for going back into that fire” and I’m paraphrasing him terribly, but basically it’s that it isn’t that he is so smart but that he has a great deal of patience.

Anyway, I’m taking us all over the place, now. I can ramble.

Now I’ve got a couple of questions about [your character on Saving Hope] Dr. Joel Goran, if that’s alright.

Oh, of course.

Tell us about Joel in your own words. Let’s say you were going to set him up with a friend of yours, how would you describe him?

Oh my god, I don’t think I would set Joel Goran up with a friend of mine! I mean, it’s weird. It’s almost like, the more you discover about him, the more enigmatic he becomes. It wouldn’t be possible to try to set him up with a friend of mine because I’d know immediately from talking with him that his heart is set on Alex Reid, played by the wonderful Erica Durance. And I think that he has two loves, really: there’s Alex Reid, which he buries beneath this mountain of work, which is his other love. That’s his other great passion pursuit. He’s an interesting figure because he’s made a decision to be this kind of solitary figure. That alone is one of his enigmas. Any relationship he has is one that he gets through his work. I think that he’s deeply ambitious and he has never stayed in one place terribly long. At the moment I think he’s probably been at Hope Zion, the hospital, for so long it’s testing his threshold, as it were. He’s seeing how long he can deal with the administrative qualities of his new position and the bureaucracies therein.

My follow-up question was about those new responsibilities that we see him taking on at the end of last season. Do you think he’s ready? What can we expect going forward?

Which proffers the other question, to what extent is Joel sticking around because Alex is there? I wish I could answer that. (Laughs.) I think I kinda can, but that’s really for the audience to discern as we move forward.

The second season of ‘Saving Hope’ premieres Tuesday, June 25 on CTV. The companion piece Last Call is airing online, comprised of shorts featuring the characters off-hours, giving fans a glimpse of their lives outside of Hope Zion. You can watch the first episode featuring series stars Michael Shanks and Kristopher Turner here.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Examining the fall season of CanCon

ctv13-02

Broadcasters have had their upfront presentations and announced their fall primetime seasons, so now we can get the microscope out to look at their Canadian offerings. (In the case of Global, an electron microscope may be needed.) I am, as usual, only including scripted and reality shows, so excluding news, sports, newsmagazines, specials, movies, documentary series or infotainment series.

CBC

I wanted to write a post about CBC’s 2013/14 season when they launched it, but it would have been nearly identical to what I wrote for 2012/13: this isn’t the public broadcaster I want. The upcoming year shows minimal risk, aiming for middle-of-the-road appeal, a renewal of everything that moves despite ratings, no new scripted series, and a foreign import for prime time — more egregiously, they felt the need to import a cop show when those comprise a large percentage of Canada’s gross domestic product.

However, what I said last year is more true this year: CBC is in a difficult place financially and politically (Executive Director for commissioned and scripted programming Sally Catto gave us a candid interview about how the budget cuts have affected programming). And some of their mid-season TV movies and mini-series seem promising. And at least their slate of CanCon is visible to the naked eye.

CanCon scripted and reality series for fall primetime:

  • Battle of the Blades (1 hour)
  • Cracked (1 hour)
  • Dragons’ Den (1 hour)
  • Heartland (1 hour)
  • Murdoch Mysteries (1 hour)
  • Republic of Doyle (1 hour)
  • Rick Mercer Report (1/2 hour)
  • 22 Minutes (1/2 hour)

Total: 7 hours

City

With less market penetration than the others, City is often the poor cousin in terms of Canadian series as well. This year, their fall season has more than the other private networks if you count those that will air first on specialty network OLN. Which I don’t quite, except maybe half marks for effort. They gave Seed a surprise renewal for 2014 — the ratings didn’t entirely justify it, but perhaps they’ll experiment with a different timeslot or find other ways to grow the audience that shrank last year — and have Mother Up and Meet The Family on the horizon for mid-season.

I have mixed feelings about the scheduling of their one true original fall show, Package Deal. The premiere date has been pushed back more than once; they seem to have landed on airing it on June 24 as last announced but then delaying the rest of the season for a fall run. They used the “because, hockey” excuse for two delays, which make them seem like the only Canadians unaware of the playoffs. But I do admire them for breaking away from the model of summer season being the safe season for CanCon, and for putting their new multi-camera comedy between two US multi-camera comedies (single-cam Seed’s old spot between How I Met Your Mother and 2 Broke Girls, but without the draw of a Big Bang Theory rerun at the same time to pilfer viewers).

CanCon scripted and reality series for fall primetime:

  • Package Deal (1/2 hour)
  • The Liquidator (OLN first run – 1 hour)
  • The Project: Guatemala (OLN first run – 1 hour)
  • Storage Wars Canada (OLN first run – 1/2 hour)

Total: 1/2 hour or if I’m generous, 3 hours

CTV

As CTV bragged in their 2013/14 launch media release, “In total, CTV’s fall schedule features 17.5 hours of simulcast programming weekly, more than any other Canadian network.” So you know the CanCon news isn’t great. Apparently Bell Media president Kevin Crull has said he can see a time soon when in-season primetime will be 25% Canadian, but that time is not now. The network has announced one CanCon series launching in fall this year — Played (I will imagine your surprise that it’s another cop show) — while MasterChef Canada was announced for mid-season (I’ll imagine your surprise that it’s another Reality Show X Canada format) and Motive is renewed for a second season.

CanCon scripted and reality series for fall primetime:

  • Played (1 hour)

Total: 1 hour

Global

Coming off their cancellation of Bomb Girls, Global announced two new scripted series slated for mid-season: hospital drama Remedy and comedy Working the Engels. But alone among the major networks, they have no Canadian scripted or reality shows added to their fall schedule.

CanCon scripted and reality series for fall primetime:

  • Nothing (0 hours)
  • Yup, apparently really nothing (0 hours)
  • They do have Walk the Walk on Saturday nights — a documentary series about Canada’s Walk of Fame — but I’m not including anyone else’s documentary series (or Saturday nights as primetime) so this shouldn’t count. But I’m throwing them a bone.

Total: 0 hours. No I’m not generous enough to include Walk the Walk‘s 1 hour here.

For an at-a-glance chart of Canadian networks’ fall season, check out The TV Addict’s Definitive Fall 2013 Primetime TV Schedule (Canadian edition).

Photo by Cameron Archer

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

The Minor Leagues (aka Bell versus The Blogger)

I’ve been working with some new contributors for this site and had an email exchange with one about my philosophy of coverage — probably the first time I’ve put it down so concisely (no, I know, it’s not that concise, and neither is this post) :

I want friendly interviews, not contentious, and honest but fair reviews — but I don’t mind an edge and I love a strong point of view, and I stay away from fangirl/boy gushing. If you hate or love a show you’re reviewing feel free to say so strongly — but make a case for your position either way. My philosophy is that treating shows and the industry like they can’t handle criticism is helping perpetuate the feeling that Canadian shows are the poor cousin of US shows — the “don’t kick the puppy” syndrome.

… [The site is] obviously intended to promote and support the Canadian TV industry so more people will hear about the shows and choose to watch them, but my angle on that is that pretending everything’s wonderful has the opposite effect on the audience.

I wrote something in 2006 on Canadian TV’s puppy syndrome, and as the years go by, my opinion has solidified even more around this sentence I wrote then:

Worse than receiving negative criticism is being considered unworthy of discussion or debate.

But years ago I stopped writing reviews after a few too many angry emails and one instance of continued harassment from people associated with the shows — generated by lukewarm rather than negative reviews, or even entirely positive interviews that didn’t mention someone who thought they should be mentioned.

Compared to the previous writing I’d done about US series, and dealings with US network PR, it felt like I’d been sent to the minors. The amateur hour whispers are still heard from former critics, writers and producers who have since escaped.

Things have changed in my world, either because the industry has matured, people are more used to bloggers and social media, I’m more used to dealing with our homegrown industry, they’re more used to TV, eh?, or, more likely, some combination of those.

The site’s back to doing reviews and with the new contributors I’ve got traction on doing more original features and opinion pieces. I’m having fun with it, which is my main motivation for continuing to run TV, eh? — that and the encouragement from many people who work in the industry.

Engaging with people who express contempt for me is not fun. The continued saga of Bell versus The Blogger won’t be fun for most readers. But I’m making an exception to my “when it stops being fun walk away” rule by writing about it again, because the only rationale I can think of for their communications with me lately is that they want to intimidate me into shutting up.

And Bell Media isn’t a puppy: it’s a big dog in the telecommunications world in Canada. And I am not inclined to be muzzled; their attempt, if that’s what it is, makes me more likely to continue to be the yappy little dog.

I mean, come on: they’re a multi-billion dollar media conglomerate now taking on a hobby blogger at every perceived slight.

They already sent a humourless, off-point response to my challenge that they stop talking about their great PR work at a time when their PR work wasn’t great.

Today, they phoned me to object to a tweet. It’s bush league in the Canadian TV industry again.

A production company enthusiastically tweeted a link to the Agam Darshi interview saying it was arranged by CTV at their upfront presentation yesterday. I retweeted them, happy that they were happy with the interview. I also added the clarification:

Though to be pedantic about that RT, the Agam Darshi interview wasn’t via CTV or the upfront – it was arranged directly with her people.

Not much later, Bell Media (yes, I’m using the impersonal corporate entity since I don’t think it’s fair to single out an individual) called me to object and drip some more contempt my way, and somehow insinuate that calling myself pedantic was an insult to Bell Media. (By the way, Bell, you’re welcome for commissioning a positive interview about your upcoming series without costing you time or effort.)

Would it have been important to me to clarify the credit if it weren’t for Bell’s open hostility toward me? Hard to say, but probably – I am, actually, often pedantic about precision, and Darshi’s “people” deserve to not have their efforts presented to her or to Twitter as a whole as the work of the network.

I get it: I can be harsh — though I try to do it with levity — about what I perceive as failings of the Canadian television industry. And there are a lot of failings if you believe, as I do, that Canadian content should be the core business of a Canadian broadcaster. As it is, our networks are the chronic retweeters of the broadcast industry, taking another country’s content to fill their stream. And that merits discussion and debate.

The people writing the ill-considered response to my post and making ill-considered phone calls are human beings: If I were Bell, I’d probably hate me too. But they’re also PR professionals: If I were Bell, I’d hate me silently.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail