Everything about Murdoch Mysteries, eh?

Win a copy of Investigating Murdoch Mysteries!

It’s the most wonderful time of the year, when we celebrate family and the spirit of giving. As a thanks to all of the Murdoch Mysteries fans who read our reviews and interviews, we’re giving away one (1) copy of Investigating Murdoch Mysteries: The Official Companion to the Series.

Written by Murdoch Mysteries co-executive producer Michelle Ricci and Mir Bahmanyar, and with a forward by Maureen Jennings, it makes the perfect Christmas gift for any fan.

How can you win this awesome book? Simply comment below, describing your most memorable Christmas ever. It could be a great present you gave or received, or maybe it was just being with your family. Murdoch Mysteries gives us fantastic stories every week, and we’d like to hear yours.

We’ll pick a winner on Friday, Dec. 16, at noon ET and will make the announcement on this page. Good luck!

UPDATE: Congratulations to Peggy Salazar! She’s the random winner of a copy of Investigating Murdoch Mysteries: The Official Companion to the Series. A sincere thank you to everyone who shared their Christmas story on this page.

And don’t forget: Murdoch Mysteries‘ “Once Upon a Murdoch Christmas” airs Monday, Dec. 12, at 8 p.m. on CBC.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Murdoch Mysteries’ Simon McNabb breaks down “Excitable Chap”

Monday’s new episode of Murdoch Mysteries, “Excitable Chap,” marked the return of two favourites. Thomas Brackenreid was back from St. Louis, sporting a gold medal for soccer that he’d won coaching Galt to victory. Monday also saw James Pendrick back in Station House No. 4, first to hang out with Brackenreid because they’d bonded at the World’s Fair and then because, no surprise, he was suspected of murder in a very Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde storyline.

But rather than fall back into his routine, Brackenreid has been grabbed by wanderlust and excited by the world. No longer content, for the moment at least, being a copper, he’s gone off on an adventure with Pendrick—he was once again exonerated of killing—in pursuit of Ashmi, who’s stolen the inventor’s formula for the fountain of youth.

We spoke to Simon McNabb—who co-wrote the episode with showrunner Peter Mitchell—about Brackenreid’s departure, Nina and Crabtree’s breakup, and a peek at next week’s holiday special.

It was interesting to see Brackenreid return to Toronto with his world view opened up and wanderlust triggered. Could this be the final season for Brackenreid?
Simon McNabb: Well, anything is possible. I can’t speak one way or another about what happens to the character in Season 10 or any possible future seasons but he’s certainly developed a taste for wanderlust as a character. We, as writers, wanted to explore what it would give to him as a character and open some interesting avenues for him in the future.

We thought this was sort of an interesting way to explore with Tom Brackenreid. Maybe this is the 1904 equivalent of buying a sports car; getting back out there and having that sense of adventure.

It was interesting that you referenced Ota Benga in the episode, who was really part of the St. Louis World’s Fair.
That emerged organically from our desire to put in as much as possible from the history of the period and that was one of the headlines of the St. Louis World’s Fair. At the time, they had these pygmies who were essentially on display which is sort of shocking by today’s standards. We were sort of at the end of this tradition by the end of 1904, but it had been going on for years that people had been brought and put on display at world fairs. We saw a little touch of it last year in the Arctic episode when Crabtree meets the Inuit man and thinks, for a moment, that he’s part of the display. One of the headlines from the World’s Fair is that they had these pygmies on display and did keep them locked up. The young man that Brackenreid is obliquely referring to did go on an adventure for awhile and left the fair and wandered about as a free man and then was either recaptured or returned to the group and travelled around parts of the United States as sort of a cause célèbre.

You and Peter Mitchell shared writing credits on this episode. How did that work?
The story itself took awhile to develop in that the very basic notion of a Jekyll and Hyde story was one that has sort of wandered in and out of the writers’ room over and over again. At some point, the notion of doing it with James Pendrick as the Jekyll and Hyde figure stuck around and we were all tickled by it. And then, Pete Mitchell early in the development process for this season had a few ideas about it and broke out most of the story you see there quite quickly on his own and then brought me along to help him write it. We split it up as front half-back half.

murdoch1

You picked a great character to be Jekyll and Hyde. Peter Stebbings has such an emotive face.
He was such a natural fit. Peter is such a great actor when it comes to emotion and can play all sorts of different angles and elements and if you give him the opportunity he’ll play it right up to the max. I think this was the episode of Murdoch Mysteries that gave him the most room to go a little over the top. We knew he would have fun doing it, and we would have fun watching it.

I enjoyed the tongue-in-cheek reference in the script about Pendrick showing up just in time to be accused of murder.
It’s one of those things where, as a murder mystery, it’s very hard to bring back anyone without them being involved, in some way, with the murder of the episode. Sometimes we come up with a way to just have them around for the week and not accused of murder but sometimes it’s just to much fun to have them as the prime suspect. You have to wink at yourself because, at this point, the audience is pretty convinced Pendrick won’t be the killer by the end of the day.

Nina and George have broken up. What can you say about the demise of their relationship?
George’s relationships have been a roller coaster and I, for one, am in favour of it. I’ve been a sucker, since I first started watching the show, for the troubles of George’s heart. At the start of last season, we tried to challenge Crabtree a little bit when it comes to what he wants out of a relationship and life. Through the years, we have matched him up with women and all of them offered the same sort of future he imagined for himself, getting married and having a family. By introducing Nina Bloom, we forced him to challenge that. He falls for her despite having none of those things and he starts to reconsider how much he values those things or whether this very exciting love affair might be something that he likes and appreciates and wants to explore more than the conventional lifestyle.

As soon as we did that, we realized we’d have to bring in someone who represented the more traditional choice and see if he really was ready throw away the whole notion of settling down and having kids. That’s what we’re trying to explore; where he lands I’m not sure.

I laughed out loud when Julia said, ‘I’ve had better,’ after Pendrick kissed her while he was The Lurker.
That was a line written by Peter Mitchell.

What can you tease about the next episode, the holiday special ‘Once Upon a Murdoch Christmas’?
It focuses more heavily on Crabtree than last year’s special. He is sort of at the centre of the main mystery and story this year. This year he is really in the thick of what is, I think, an exciting and delightful adventure.

Murdoch Mysteries airs Mondays at 8 p.m. on CBC.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Photo gallery: First look at “Once Upon a Murdoch Christmas”

It truly is the most wonderful time of the year, as Murdoch Mysteries‘ two-hour holiday special, “Once Upon a Murdoch Christmas” approaches. Written by Paul Aitken, Carol Hay and Michelle Ricci and directed by T.W. Peacocke, CBC says the following:

It’s four days ‘til Christmas, and with no snow on the streets of Toronto, spirits are low until two bombastic businessmen barge into Station House No. 4 with a far-fetched story about a train robbery – a bandit is trying to steal Christmas! Murdoch is baffled but soon, more impossible robberies have him giving chase around the city. Crabtree is convinced the bandit is based on his latest fictional hero but Brackenreid dismisses this outlandish theory. Meanwhile, Constable Jackson forms a Station House No. 4 choir, but with only a few days to whip the singing constables into shape he begs Rebecca James for help. And Ogden finds herself mysteriously spirited away after a family of children who need her help mistake her for a storybook heroine. Stories collide on Christmas Eve – and once again, Murdoch must find a way to pull off a Christmas miracle.

CBC has given us an early Christmas present by revealing the following seven images to get you in the holiday mood! Let me know what you think of the storyline, and images, by commenting below!

[slideshow_deploy id=’38144′]

 

Murdoch Mysteries‘ “Once Upon a Murdoch Christmas” airs Monday, Dec. 12, at 8 p.m. on CBC, with an encore broadcast on Christmas Day, Sunday, December 25, at 5 p.m.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Murdoch Mysteries’ Jordan Christianson chats “Weekend at Murdoch’s”

Jordan Christianson created perhaps the funniest episode of Murdoch Mysteries ever on Monday night. “Weekend at Murdoch’s” was chock-full of double entendre, jokes and sight gags in its homage to Weekend at Bernie’s and provided a comedy clinic thanks to Cyrus Lane, who returned to the show as Roger Newsome.

And while the scenes involving Crabtree, Higgins and Newsome were uproariously funny—his body was carried around Toronto to appear he was still alive and could testify against Rex Gray—it was sad to say goodbye to a character the Murdoch writer’s room has loved to breathe life into.

We spoke to Christianson about “Weekend at Murdoch’s,” and that fact Cyrus Lane may not be finished with Murdoch Mysteries after all.

I think this is the funniest episode of Murdoch Mysteries that has ever been done. Congratulations on a great script.
Jordan Christianson: Thanks. It’s certainly the most overtly comic of the season, if not the history of the show. It’s perhaps testing the boundaries of what you can get away with in an hour-long murder mystery procedural, but I’m quite pleased with it and we had a lot of fun making it.

Why is Roger Newsome a favourite in the writers’ room?
At the end of Season 7, we had a murder that took place in a pompous, rich-boy club kind of setting and we figured we needed a few rich boys. At the outset, it wasn’t expressly written that Roger would be a twit, but when Cyrus Lane was cast we realized there was great comic potential for the character. At the beginning of every year, we would try to come up with a reason to bring him back.

Talk about that process. You write a character and then they are cast. It’s at that point you realize, ‘Holy crap, we need to have more Roger and Cyrus in the future.’
He’s simultaneously one of those guys who very much feels of the period. Older actors seem to feel the period than younger actors. Sometimes when we have a younger actor on the show, they can’t help but feel a little contemporary to me. Cyrus was one of those guys who has a very timeless, period kind of look in the way that he carries himself. He’s got the Stratford Festival background and has the theatre training that lends itself well to the Victorian era. Newsome articulates well and enunciates and has good posture and seems well-bred and wealthy. Cyrus is a very keen actor and picks up whatever intended bits of humour there are in the script and adds a ton of his own, particularly when he’s working with Jonny, Lachlan and Yannick. Those guys improvised quite a bit and were coming up with physical, slapsticky gags between takes.

murdoch2

I did wonder about improvisation, especially when Newsome was being carted around on the street and Cyrus did over-the-top waves to folks in the crowd.
The idea to do that was scripted, but it’s easy enough to write it in the script and it was up to the actors to coordinate how to do it. Yannick would be pushing the chair working the knobs to supposedly cause the body to move, but they needed to time that perfectly. They had to coordinate a lot of that. There was a fair amount of ad-libbing of dialogue as well and moments, like when Crabtree is manning the wheelchair outside of the ornithology event and Newsome punches Crabtree. That was something Jonny and Cyrus worked out on their own. Jonny actually improvised one of my favourite lines in the script. At one point he’s speaking to Louise Cherry and Louise says, ‘For the sake of my story, I’d love to interview Mr. Newsome. It would really spruce things up.’ And Jonny says, ‘Well, he can’t speak because, even though he was wearing the bullet-proof vest, he broke a rib.’ That was scripted, but Jonny then said something along the line of, ‘In fact, it’s almost as if he’s not breathing at all.’

As I remember it, when we conceived the story initially we were just going to cast the role of the witness that gets assassinated and ends up in the wheelchair for the whole show. And then somebody else in the room—I think it was Simon [McNabb]—had the idea of it being Roger Newsome. At once it was, ‘It would be a shame to lose him,’ but also knowing how good of a physical comic Cyrus is, we began to realize they’d have to do a lot of work in that chair in order to sell the comic premise and we already knew Cyrus could do it. And having it be a character that we met a few times before and has a preexisting relationship with our guys—particularly Crabtree—we thought would also bring an added layer to the story we wouldn’t have had if we just cast John Smith.

As great as Newsome was in this episode, you did kill him off. What are your thoughts, seeing as he’s been a room favourite?
[Showrunner] Pete’s motto is always to not assume there will be another season so if we have a good idea we should go ahead and do it. The consolation is that we created the character of Roger Newsome’s sister, Ruth, and perhaps she can carry on the torch of the Newsome family. I wouldn’t be surprised if, as we got to know Ruth more, there might be a cousin or something that has a striking resemblance to Roger.

Regarding the murder case itself, it was interesting to have our team take on the case of Rex Gray after Station No. 3 couldn’t close it.
It also covered off the necessity to explain why Murdoch wasn’t able to solve the initial case. We didn’t want to dwell on the details of the original case. We just wanted to get to the murder right away and not have to fill in any more backstory than was necessary.

OK, why is Henry Higgins still on the force?!
He should have been fired after this one and if there is a flaw in this episode—and I’m sure there are many—is that I never quite found a way to do was find that redeeming moment for Higgins at the end of the episode. It was packed with so much stuff that I just couldn’t find that moment.

Murdoch Mysteries airs Mondays at 8 p.m. on CBC.

Images courtesy of CBC.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail