Sorry to know that Blackstone is ending. Do hope there will be DVDs made available for us who werenâ€™t able to get APTN. Where will we be able to follow whatâ€™s happening with the cast? â€”Carol
Weâ€™ll be keeping you up to date on everything that the cast is up to. As for catching up on Blackstone, you can watch all of the past seasons on APTNâ€™s website.Â Carmen Moore update: sheâ€™s co-starring in Foxâ€™s drama, Second Chance.
Watched the final reveal episodeâ€”blech! My husband and I preferred the original over the final house. That powder room … ugh. Iâ€™m sorry Sarah, but an interior designer you are not. â€”Bev
While this writer has a point, Blais isnâ€™t entirely wrong either. Quantity means that there will be more but more isnâ€™t necessarily good. Having to hit quotas could actually encourage laziness as people just put out the bare minimum to meet the levels they are forced too. This in turn makes it harder for quality to break out the sea of weakness around it.
Blaisâ€™ theory is by pooling more resources into fewer projects those projects have a better chance of making an impact, and people wonâ€™t be lazy because they have no backup project to hide behind so what they put out is expected to be strong with all the resources it gets. The fact is U.S. shows would crush us in the fall so winter and spring is a better bet for Canadian TV anyway.
Now, quality in art is subjective. If you want something to be watched a lot and be profitable, procedurals like NCIS are your way to go. If you want accolades and prestige you need smaller but meaningful shows like Orphan Black. You want initial buzz, you need a big concept like the upcoming The Expanse. Buzz, prestige and high viewership is hard to do all at once unless you areÂ Game of Thrones or The Walking Dead.Â â€”DanAmazing
Some insightful points made by all here! And a relief to hear some WGC voices that are aware of the particulars of that incessant guessing game with our CRTC re: future standards on production. I do believe, however, that we have some challenges here on an entirely different â€œplatform,â€ if you will: the challenge is, as someone has already thoughtfully pointed out here, one of interpreting â€œquality,â€ but *before* becoming, typically, titillated by the busyness of quantity.
Once upon a time, a few years back, I had a show in development with the CBC: everyone was nice … well, thatâ€™s about it. No one knew how to speak to the (proposed) quality of the possible show. No one. Everyone claimed they knew, but very simply put, no one had the *skills* to speak about what makes a story palatable to what makes a show even compelling. No one. Who possesses the skills that can deepen the quality of a story? Where does one, as a skill and not from a rÃ©sumÃ©, gain the knowledge of how to develop the art of a story? Where is this quality of development?
We donâ€™t know how to develop stories anymore. Where we need quantity is in thoughtfulness, consultation, and caring discussion within the discipline of story development. Slow down everything! Humbly, letâ€™s learn what quality is as creators, and apply that *knowledge* to our attempts at Development *before* â€œrushingâ€ to principal photography. There needs to be moreâ€”get ready!â€”faith in creators. And there needs to be more resources in development. (Good Lord! We had so few on our show.)
So, Mr. Blais may have opened up the possibility for consultation on this highly artistic matter named â€œquality.â€ Maybe itâ€™s our responsibility to truly wonder what this word is and remove ourselves from this addiction as Canadians and consumers to â€œkeep busy.â€ Death to our TV. Long live our TV.
Got a question or comment about Canadian TV? firstname.lastname@example.org or @tv_eh.