Everything about Featured, eh?

Wild Archaeology visits Head-Smashed-In

This week our intrepid explorers from Wild Archaeology headed to Head-Smashed-In, the oldest known buffalo jump—it goes back at least 6,000 years—located in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains in Alberta. This particular site has been widely studied due to the deep connection between those communities in the plains and the buffalo.

Upon arrival on site we met Dr. Reg Crowshoe, a Piikani Elder, who described the story of Head-Smashed-In:

“Way back when Creator gave us the buffalo, Creator said, ‘You ask the buffalo to feed you.’ They couldn’t find the buffalo. They looked all over. Then one woman went to get water and she heard this song. So when she heard this song she seen it. It was a buffalo stone. She heard this buffalo stone singing. She took it and gave it to the elders and other sacred people. The sacred people said that buffalo stone is going to find us buffalo to eat. So there was a ceremony. That song was part of that ceremony.”

Dr. Crowshoe then summarized: “That story told us ‘You ask the buffalo for the rights to hunt buffalo.’ So when they went through the ceremony, that song that woman heard, that song was like a hunting permit in the white man world.”

Next, archaeologist Jack Brink described the science of how the plains people managed to drive a herd of buffalo through this narrow drive lane, taking advantage of their poor eyesight, and the optical illusion that the downhill run naturally creates. It was here at the end of a stampede, encouraged by the hunters, the buffalo would meet their demise, spilling over the ledge and falling to their deaths. These communal buffalo hunts necessitated the cooperation of hundreds of people, skinning, butchering, cooking and preserving the products the buffalo provided.

Jack then demonstrated how the lines of cairns, or what he calls traffic markers, were used to steer the herd through the final drive lane leading the buffalo to the jump. To illustrate how these markers worked, Jacob and Jenifer each constructed one from rocks and brush found from the vicinity. The object was to create a large peripheral mass using brush secured by rocks the buffalo would naturally avoid as they stampeded through what appeared to be a valley.

This episode, although no artifacts were found, was such a fascinating story to learn about. I am truly sad there are only three more episodes to cover this season. Each week I look forward to all that I learn, and I am still telling people, “you have to watch this show!”

Wild Archaeology airs Tuesdays at 7:30 p.m. ET on APTN.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

TV Eh B Cs podcast 53 — Hosting Jessi Cruickshank

jessicruickshank2016b-highresJessi Cruickshank is one of Canada’s most beloved TV personalities and has been hailed as “one of the funniest women on TV today, period” by The Province. Cruickshank grew up in Vancouver where she broke into comedy as the only girl in an all-male improv troupe alongside Seth Rogen. She soon became a household name as the face of MTV, hosting the daily comedy show MTV Live and smash hit The Hills After Show, which was syndicated in 10 countries and generated record-breaking ratings in Canada and the U.S.

Cruickshank went on to host Live from E!, Jerseylicious, Olympic Morning and recently wrapped six seasons as the LA correspondent for Canada’s #1 entertainment show, etalk. She has also travelled the world as a keynote speaker and the Canadian ambassador for Free the Children.

Cruickshank returned to CBC in the fall of 2016 as one of the co-hosts of CBC’s highly anticipated new daytime show The Goods, and to host Season 3 of Canada’s Smartest Person.

Canada’s Smartest Person airs Sundays at 8 p.m. on CBC.

Listen or download below, or subscribe via iTunes or any other podcast catcher with the TV, eh? podcast feed.

Want to support TV, eh?’s work? Become a Patreon!

SUPPORT

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

The Beaverton website heads to The Comedy Network for TV

Regardless of who the next President of the United States is, The Beaverton has got it covered. The televised adaptation of the satirical website The Beaverton debuts Wednesday night on The Comedy Network with two possible lead stories. In one? The end of the world. The other? Bill Clinton is the First Husband. [Update: Armageddon it is.]

We were one of the over 100 sitting in the audience watching The Beaverton record its second-to-last Season 1 episode last week and it made for a fun night. Each of the 13 episodes finds anchors Emma Hunter (Mr. D) and Miguel Rivas (Meet the Family) and correspondents in news reporter Aisha Alfa, provocateur Donavon Stinson, financial correspondent Laura Cilevitz and foreign correspondent Marilla Wex skewering world topics.

Co-created by Luke Gordon Field and Jeff Detsky as well as website editors Jacob Duarte Spiel and Alexander Saxton, Pier 21’s Lazlo Barna and Melissa Williamson are executive producers.

“TV was always the dream,” Field says of creating an offshoot of the website for television. “I grew up on satirical television shows like The Daily Show … they were always my favourite shows. When I started writing political satire comedy, it was always in the back of my mind that it would be fun to create a TV show. I didn’t know that The Beaverton was ever going to have that opportunity and wasn’t working towards it. We were just building our name.”

Enter Detsky (Orphan Black), who noticed his Facebook friends were posting Beaverton stories on their news feeds. He immediately recognized the unique voice the site had and its reach (more than six million views in 2016) and knew it was a natural transition to television. Production on Season 1 happened in a nondescript warehouse shared by a church and the upcoming Top Chef Canada All-Stars, with Field, Detsky and 16 writers—most recently Kurt Smeaton, Scott Montgomery and Rupinder Gill—creating, doing table reads, punching up scripts and filming external bits in the week leading up to Thursday night tapings and production that has been rolling since late spring.

This is not The Daily Show. The Beaverton isn’t reacting to what happened in America, Canada or globally the day before. That, Field says, forces them to create original content not necessarily based on a headline. That frees the team up to cover stories that are always on the peripheral, like the Loonie, at a 20-year low, being swapped out in favour of Canadian Tire money.

And while Hunter and Rivas have extensive experience in sketch comedy writing, neither contribute to The Beaverton room. Instead, they’ve focused on delivering the stories and creating their on-screen personas. Rivas is buttoned-up and stiff, so unlike his actual personality, and Hunter is arrogant and braggy, totally opposite her self-deprecating humour when cameras aren’t rolling.

“We both approached it as, ‘What would make the best dynamic behind the desk and what’s original?'” Hunter explains. “Stereotypically, the story is the guy is a goof and super-funny and the girl checks him. This organic thing happened [between us] from the audition where we had this wonderful rhythm of give and take of being the straight man or having a moment and the characters evolved from there.”

“As a man, I agree with everything she just said,” Rivas says with a laugh.

The Beaverton airs Wednesdays at 10:30 p.m. ET/PT on The Comedy Network.

Image via Bell Media.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Murdoch Mysteries’ Carol Hay breaks down “Jagged Little Pill”

Like many Murdoch Mysteries fans, I’ve been anxious to have some serious storyline time devoted to Rebecca James. Yes, we did get some backstory about her in “Colour Blinded,” but we wanted more. Thankfully Monday’s newest, “Jagged Little Pill,” sated our thirst for Rebecca, as she was front and centre doing a little investigating of her own after a schoolmate at the Ontario Medical College for Women turned up dead.

Though Dr. Ogden and the police considered it a suicide, Rebecca wasn’t sure. Upon more digging, she not only uncovered a secret about her friend Sarah, but her case intersected with Murdoch’s hunt for the killer of a rich man.

We spoke to the episode’s writer, Carol Hay, about the storyline, the real history behind the Ontario Medica College for Women and, well, syphilis. Also? We get a sneak peek into next week’s episode, “Bend it Like Brackenreid.”

How do you walk that line developing a character like Rebecca while staying true to what Murdoch Mysteries is?
Carol Hay: You develop character through story. In the most successful drama you inform who the character is and you explore who the character is by how they act. Rebecca not only took something on, but was going against Dr. Ogden. She was actually in her own way trusting her instincts about her friend and saying, ‘I don’t think she killed herself.’ It’s very interesting because, in my first draft, I had a much stronger scene with Ogden where Ogden basically says, ‘You’re wrong, move on.’ And everybody felt I was being too harsh because Rebecca had obviously lost a friend.

I was very happy we did a story about the Medical College and it was natural to have Rebecca stepping into her own world.

murdoch2

Rebecca has great enthusiasm when she’s talking about putting McInnis’ liver and kidneys into bottles.
That’s something we did in terms of character development. I liked that we introduced her very tentatively. It was period accurate. I liked that we brought her in as the cleaner in the morgue and Ogden spotting something in her and fought for her to come and work in the morgue. The idea was, when we moved to this season, she feels comfortable and can make jokes. It’s a sign of her maturity and sign of her growing confidence.

After 10 seasons of adding little bits of development to the other cast, it must be fun to create Rebecca because she’s a clean slate.
Yes, absolutely. It’s always difficult to add a new character because it’s another character to serve. It’s finding her a place in the stories that doesn’t take away from Ogden. Rebecca is very ahead of her time. She’s young and has the youthful energy, and that attitude has been really fun to write.

We also got a little bit of a history lesson with regard to the Ontario Medical College for Women and its beginnings as Women’s Medical College and its ties to Dr. Emily Stowe. It was also neat to have Emily’s daughter, Augusta, teaching at the school.
It’s true. Augusta Stowe-Gullen was at the medical college at that time. It was terrific to look into all of that. We take liberties, obviously, with the actual history. That medical college really did exist because it was thought that men and women shouldn’t be taught together. One of the scenes I wanted to explore in this episode was the medical establishment’s attitude toward women and whether they were capable of the challenges of being a doctor.

All the stuff about the coming together of the two cases, the research into syphilis and the sleeping sickness is visually all historically accurate. There was a brilliant scientist in Germany at that time who was researching the sleeping sickness at the same time as other scientists were looking at a cure for syphilis. It really was a coincidental thing.

Before Hemphell is revealed as the killer, he was showing respect to the ladies in his class. He wasn’t talking down to them.
He wasn’t a flirt, but he enjoyed teaching the women. We wanted to show that his sexism was a little more buried. It would have been easy to make him a jerk from the beginning and everyone would know was the villain.

Do you recall where the medical school scenes were filmed?
It was at a medical college in Guelph, Ont.

Julia was offered a teaching position at the college. Can you comment on how that turns out?
It’s something we pick up in a future episode. I’ll leave it at that.

Thank you to whoever added ‘automatic dishwashing cupboard’ and ‘standing bath’ to the script.
[Laughs.] That was likely Paul Aitken.

What can you say about next week’s episode, “Bend it Like Brackenreid”?
It takes place in the world of soccer and features the Brackenreid’s prowess on the soccer field. A friend of Brackenreid’s is coaching the game to decide who represents Canada at the 1904 Olympic Games. It’s between U of T and Galt, which is completely historically accurate.

Murdoch Mysteries airs Mondays at 8 p.m. on CBC.

Images courtesy of CBC.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

This Life writer Maxim Morin dissects Natalie’s “Scanxiety”

Spoiler warning: Do not read this article until you have seen This Life Episode 205, “Scanxiety.”

For a season and a half, This Life‘s Natalie Lawson has been living under the assumption she is dying. However, in Sunday’s “Scanxiety,” co-written by showrunner Joseph Kay and Maxim Morin, Natalie received encouraging test results from her drug trial–and discovered her fate may not be as certain as she believed.

“We wanted to allow [Natalie] to realize what this new normal is, and what that is is a new chance at life, at a longer life than she thought she was going to have,” explains Morin. “So that’s really exciting, but with that comes the kind of Spiderman responsibility of being true to what the story is about and what the show is about, which is, ‘How do you live your life in the face of uncertainty and mortality?'”

“Scanxiety” is the first writing credit for Morin, who was This Life‘s script coordinator in Season 1 and got bumped up to junior story editor in Season 2.

“It was scary, it was fun, and I would do it again,” he says of writing the script.

Morin joins us by phone from Toronto to tell us more about his debut episode and what Natalie’s surprising test results could mean for the rest of the season.

You co-wrote this episode with Joseph Kay. What was that like for you?
Maxim Morin: There were a lot of things we were trying to get across, and I felt–and we all felt collectively in the room–the pressure to showcase it. It was scary in that way in one respect, but it was also super freeing, because [Joseph] will never admit this, but he’ll teach you things you don’t even know you’re being taught in the moment, but then you’ll reflect on it, and you’ll be like, “Wow.” Those are what I like to call his John Keating moments. They’re so not intentional or conscious. He’ll just be very, very open to new ideas and the whole room is that way. As a collective, we hear each other out, and we respect each other’s ideas. We’re able to express ourselves in the places where we’re designated to write.

Natalie doesn’t find out her test results until the very end of the episode. Was there a conscious effort to build the audience’s tension and anxiety by making us wait the entire episode alongside Natalie?
When you have this kind of illness, a lot of the time it’s hurrying up and waiting, you’re going to go on this treatment and then we just kind of have to wait and see. And we wondered, how do people wait? How do you wait for that piece of news in that envelope or in that file folder sitting in a hospital or in a clinic in a doctor’s office? How do you wait for that? And so we wondered how Natalie would wait for that, and what we discovered is that there’s no good way to go about this. This was her way, just to do what she had planned, because obviously the news of whether this treatment was going well or not well was going to exacerbate all the tension that’s been building up this season. That idea of waiting that you touched on was something we were really cognizant of and we were really curious about.

The scene where Tia admits to Natalie that she isn’t ready to die is pretty raw and real. What were discussions like in the writers’ room regarding that moment?
The development of that scene, the room had to look at how they themselves would deal with or would act like or say in the face of imminent death. And so it got really personal, and it got really emotional. And I think what we collectively agreed upon, or definitely could relate to was this idea that, no matter how prepared you are, no matter what steps you have taken–and Natalie and Tia have both taken a lot of steps, as we’ve seen–there’s no way for you to be completely at ease at the end. Discovering that collectively as a room was really intense but also really, really rewarding. And that scene took a lot of work by committee to try to get it to a place where it felt authentic and true.

Natalie gets very good news regarding her clinical trial, learning she’s in partial remission and could possibly even survive. What should viewers expect from her health going forward?
Natalie and her entire family have been living in this one mode for such a long time now, for a season and a half basically. They’ve been living in this bunker of, ‘The pillar of our family is facing life’s biggest challenge’, and once that air is lifted off this idea, once that certainty is lifted, how are they going to react, knowing full well that they’ve spent so much time planning and organizing around this idea that Natalie will no longer be a part of this family? How are they going to react to that? I think it’s not as black and white as, ‘Okay, this is good news, so we should all be happy about this and make life go back to normal, as it was before the diagnosis.’ I don’t think there is a normal anymore for the Lawsons.

Matthew and Nicole are moving forward with their separation, and Matthew moved into his new apartment. Where is his head now that it appears his attempts to save his marriage have failed?
Matthew has always been a fixer, he’s always wanted to repair the damage that’s been done, no matter how much more damage it will create. Internally, he believes he’s doing the right thing, and I think Nicole gets an air of that when she goes to Beatrice’s house. The plan is misguided–completely misguided–he’s just trying to yield the result that he’s just trying to do the human thing here and be a father to his son. And now that Matthew’s thrown the Hail Mary pass with terrible results, he’s ready to move on with his life a little bit.

There are flashback scenes of teenage Maggie witnessing her parents fighting. Why was that important to portray now?
I think Maggie has always had this trouble with intimacy. In Season 1, we explored that a lot with her polyamorous relationship. In the end, she kind of diverted away from that potential intimacy. And this season, she’s created this false relationship with this guy, that is basically the opposite of intimacy. And we really want to narrow in on this point of, ‘Well, how’d she get that way?’ Because Maggie is super singular in that way, almost to the point where it was difficult to see where these things came from, and I think we really took a step back, really went into her past, dug through that, and we started to ask, ‘Well, what must of it been like to live in this household?’

What we kind of fell upon and discovered and talked about was this idea that she grew up in a place that was an intimacy vacuum, so to speak. And I think in that scene, we get just a little snippet of that experience. We realize that Janine and Gerald’s marriage was not perfect. It’s at a different place now, but back then it was not perfect. And I think it informed the way she related with this idea of intimacy moving forward. We just wanted to give the audience a glimpse of why she is the way she is.

Maggie and Raza end up sleeping together. What’s going on with them?
What happened at the end of the episode is they connect physically, they have sex, and these are two people who have shown each other one of their cards in the hole, so to speak. Raza admitted that his parents don’t know about the marriage. He’s sharing a slice of himself. And Maggie has been an open book since the start of their fake marriage. So these are two people who have kind of shared a lot with each other, aren’t afraid to tell each other what they think, but still have that respect for one another that Maggie feels she isn’t getting from the rest of her family . . . But what will happen–and is more a marker of their relationship, their fake marriage building into something–is this idea of how much more vulnerable they’ll be with one another, and that takes us to surprising places.

Oliver used an unconventional approach to get his art in front of Alexis. Is this a step forward for him?
He got what he wanted from that situation, which was just to be seen, and so that was a small victory for Oliver. I think for us, the viewer, looking down at this we’re like, ‘What are you thinking? You’re like putting all your stuff in there, setting up your installation.’ For a lot of people, that would be grounds to call the cops, and a lot of people would have. But to Oliver’s credit and to his art’s credit, she took a moment and she looked at it and I think there was a glimpse there where we’re with her and we’re like, ‘What is this exactly? I don’t know, but it’s kind of cool.’ So I would argue that it’s almost a little bit of a victory for him even though the means he took to get there were very misguided.

What was your favourite part of the episode to write?
Can I say the entire fourth act? I just love it. The whole back quarter of this episode for me, it evokes the best things about this show for me. I mean–especially when [Natalie] is sitting with Dr. Lyle and getting this news–everything from the direction to the sound to the dialogue to everything, it really just sings in that scene. It’s just so simple. We stay on her, we see her reacting to this news, and we’re just still. Everything is just still. And from there, we kind of launch into this wonderful sequence of letting go. And when she returns Jude the cat, and you have “Downtown” by Majical Cloudz playing overtop, it’s hard to retain any sense of straightfaceness, you know? Bye, bye composure. It was a pleasure having to work on every part of this episode, and it’s a credit to the writers on the team, the crew, obviously the cast, the director. I’m really proud of it.

This Life airs Sundays at 9 p.m. on CBC.

Images courtesy of CBC.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail