All posts by Greg David

Prior to becoming a television critic and owner of TV, Eh?, Greg David was a critic for TV Guide Canada, the country's most trusted source for TV news. He has interviewed television actors, actresses and behind-the-scenes folks from hundreds of television series from Canada, the U.S. and internationally. He is a podcaster, public speaker, weekly radio guest and educator, and past member of the Television Critics Association.

Review: Broken Heartland

Kids say the darnedest things, don’t they? And in the case of Katie, it was a doozy.

“Divorce!” she piped up during the most awkward family dinner on Heartland in, like, forever. Thus the main focus of Sunday’s newest episode, “Faking It,” dealt with the effect of Lou and Peter’s separation becoming pubic knowledge. And while some handled the it pretty much like I thought they would—Tim made a bad situation worse by blaming it all on Peter—Jack stepped up and did the thing he does best: make those hurting feel better. The most touching scene of the night was clearly when he hugged a weeping Georgie and told her everything would be all right. Clearly it won’t—any child of divorced parents will tell you that—but it isn’t the end of the world either.

Kudos to Heartland‘s writers for having Georgie ask some pointed questions of her parents and not fall into any trite, lines other TV shows have already over-used. By the time Georgie climbed up on her horse and did her extreme riding tricks she was able to concentrate and nail a spot on the team. Take that, Olivia!

Meanwhile, Jesse—who has been pretty quiet all season long—unleashed his master plan on Ty and Caleb. After luring Caleb into a partnership, Jesse called in the loan and made ready to not only re-claim his family’s land but drive Amy out of business. Ty, of course, handled it badly and will likely have some assault charges added as insult to injury. Maybe Ty and Amy will be married in jail?

Notes and quotes

  • “You’ll still be a family. You’ll just look a little different is all.” Jack makes the best of a bad situation.
  • When is Tim going to learn that his first assumptions are always wrong? Reggie = Regina, dude.
  • I know everyone will adjust, but seeing Peter portrayed as the enemy was tough to watch.

Heartland airs Sundays at 7 p.m. on CBC.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Comments and queries for the week of March 13

With only a few more episodes to go, Heartland fans were torn over whether Peter and Lou’s marriage really is on the rocks and several readers weighed in on this week’s He Said/She Said column regarding how “Canadian” Canadian TV shows should be.

I don’t want them to separate because of the girls but I think Peter has been kind of selfish throughout their relationship (not that Lou hasn’t made her share of mistakes) I’d like to see a bit more character growth on the show though. Seems like every character is stuck in their own ways. Especially Tim and Lou.—Amber

I personally wouldn’t want Lou and Peter to separate, but I have to agree it would be interesting to see how the writers wold have it happen. I think they will end up being together but it’s sure going to be a rough[er!] ride. I don’t know how they would do it. As for the vow renewal, maybe it’s kind of selfish but I wouldn’t like to see them “steal” Amy and Ty’s moment hahaha! This was an amazing episode. Got me in tears! The show just keeps getting better and better!—Luiza

I always liked Peter, and do hope that he and Lou can work things out. (Plus, I’ve loved Peter’s interactions with Georgie, and Katie seems to miss him when he’s not around.) It’s not as if Heartland hasn’t had the theme of divorce lurking in the background; Tim and Marion divorced. Lisa is a divorcée (Dan Hartfield was her first husband). Most notably, Caleb Odell and Ashley Stanton split not long after they got married. This would be the first time one of “the family” came undone front and centre (and not as a matter of ancient family history).

But I like what you’ve posited: If Lou and Peter can get their act together, it sure would be nice to see them renew their vows when Amy and Ty make their vows (though I think there would be some in the Amy/Ty camp who would want it to be *their* day, and their day alone).—TheRealTC

 

Wow, Diane. You said things perfectly. To me, setting is important. I look at my favourite 20 current shows (Downton Abbey, Orphan Black, Call the Midwife, Outlander, Nashville, Parenthood, Vikings, The Originals, The 100, Empire, Revenge, Finding Carter, Chasing Life, Grey’s Anatomy, Hard Rock Medical, Hart of Dixie, Orange is the New Black, Longmire, Arrow and Mohawk Girls) and only two–Orphan Black and Finding Carter–don’t have defined settings. However, neither seem to go out of their way to hide their setting; they just don’t clarify it.

What I have a problem with when it comes to several Canadian shows is that they seem to go out of their way to hide their Canadianness or they take on an American identity. That aggravates me more than anything else. Americans have enough stories if their own being told on television and we shouldn’t be telling more for them. We have our own stories to tell and our setting isn’t a negative. I go to a lot of U.S. TV sites and I never hear a complaint from Americans if there’s something Canadian in a show. The same goes for British dramas and the British accents: Downton Abbey, Sherlock, Broadchurch and The Fall all get great ratings in the States yet U.S. networks keep trying to remake them as Americanized stories.—Alicia

Got a question or comment about Canadian TV? greg@tv-eh.com or head to @tv_eh.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Interview: Vikings kills off major character

-SPOILER ALERT- Do not read until you have watched Thursday’s newest episode, “Scarred.”

And just like that, Siggy has sailed out of our lives. The former wife of Earl Heraldson, who had fallen from favour after Ragnar Lothbrok (Travis Fimmel) ascended to the role of Earl and then King, was plotting her next move in Kattegat when she died after diving into icy water to save Queen Aslaug’s two sons from drowning.

Siggy had been suspicious of Harbard (Kevin Durand) ever since he arrived in town. And though no one was sure if he had anything to do with the drowning deaths of two other boys, it sure seemed that way. Regardless, Siggy is no more and we got Jessalyn Gilsig—the Montreal-born actress who played her—on the phone to chat.

I really didn’t want to be talking to you.
Jessalyn Gilsig: Oh thank you for that.

Did you ask to leave the series or did Michael Hirst write you out? How did it come about?
I actually approached Michael. At the end of the second season I had some family things come up and they needed me in a way that being over in Ireland made it tough to take care of. I felt like I had to be there in a personal level and Michael was amazing, incredible. He has family too and understood. He was disappointed, which was incredibly flattering, but he respected my reasoning. We talked about how to do this while giving Siggy justice, so he came up with this exit for her, which I thought was beautiful and unexpected and poetic and unique.

Did you have any input into her death or was it all him?
Oh no, it was all him. We talked a little bit about what might have been and one of the things I talked about was that her whole intention upon waking every morning was to work her way back to that throne. I think that’s why Michael worked in that scene where Siggy is so frustrated with Ragnar and Aslaug’s actions that she works to take the throne back and that trajectory is cut off by the random event of her jumping in the water to save the children.


I would do anything for this show. The role gave me so much … if they want me to come back and work catering I would do that.


It was a very nice scene with her sitting on the throne again and looking over to the empty throne where Earl Haraldson had once sat. It felt very much like a full circle of sorts.
Thank you. Even for me, after three years of playing this character I would think during those scenes in the hall, ‘That’s my seat, I built this house,’ and I love that I got to go back. And you’re right, it did have that feeling of what’s ahead but also acknowledging Gabriel Byrne’s character.

Let’s talk about the scene leading up to the lake. Was that all you running through the forest?
That was all me! I love doing that kind of thing. Look, it’s such a cool job anyway, but some days they tell you, ‘OK, today you’re going to climb a mountain and dive into a frozen lake and save these children,’ and you think, ‘I could be entering numbers into a spreadsheet right now. I am a grown woman. This is my job??‘ I never, ever, ever complain. It is the best gig you could ever have and I love it. The best thing that you could tell me is that I can’t do something. It’s the best motivator for me.

Was the underwater scene filmed with you in a tank?
We shot that over a few days actually, and part of it was in a tank. Everything from the outside diving in was a tank and everything underwater was in an outside swimming pool in Ireland. It was pretty intense because they had to cover the pool so there was only one opening for light. When you were under you had to find you way back to that hole. That was kind of intense and took some practice.

History

I was grateful we had a day of rehearsal because the clothes and hair were really heavy when they were wet and we had to work out the angles with the dummies that represented the children and the kids themselves. That was the hardest part for me, putting myself in the scene without worrying about the child actors.

Was the water warm or cold?
Everything in Ireland is cold! [Laughs.] We’re Vikings, what are we going to do, complain?

Vikings has featured several visions, including Siggy seeing her daughter seconds before she went under water for the last time. Does this mean the door is open for Siggy to return as a vision?
That’s a good question. I can say on a personal level that I would do anything for this show. The role gave me so much … if they want me to come back and work catering I would do that. [Laughs.]

Was there a party for you once everyone found out Siggy was exiting the show?
On my actual last day there was a party with the cast and myself and my daughter, who is eight and is always with me, but I had already had one with the whole company. The thing is with the actors is that I’ll continue to see them because they come through L.A. and we’ll meet up. The people I’ll really miss is the crew because most of them are based in Ireland. I can’t say enough about those people. They are the most creative, committed people I have worked with in my life. They set the bar with the level of artistry on that show. I’ll miss them but I’ll go back. We have a life there.

Did you take anything from the set to remember the experience by?
They made me a beautiful necklace for Siggy that had some Viking symbols for fertility on it and that was made by the costume department for me. What I should have taken, and I’m upset I didn’t, was some of my hair extensions. I loved Siggy’s hair. It was so long and so ratty. I’ll miss that most of all.

Will you miss Siggy? Let Jessalyn know your thoughts in the comments below or via @tv_eh.

Vikings airs Thursdays at 10 p.m. ET/PT on History.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Link: CRTC Just Plain Wrong On New Canadian Content Regulations

From James Bawden:

CRTC Just Plain Wrong On New Canadian Content Regulations
I’m convinced the only regulation the CRTC should insist on is a demand from all private networks that they spend as much on Canadian programming as they spend in L.A. snatching up all the U.S. series.

Last year that figure was almost $700 million –I would be surprised if the private networks spent a third as much on Canadian shows. Continue reading.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Link: CRTC’s new plans: Quality over quantity? Good luck with that

From John Doyle of The Globe & Mail:

CRTC’s new plans: Quality over quantity? Good luck with that
If there’s a sinking feeling in some quarters of the Canadian TV racket following the announced CRTC regulatory changes, that’s wrong. The challenge presented is to be better, not entitled.

Excuse my rant but vast fortunes have been made in the sweatshop environment of Canadian content made for broadcasters, particularly specialty channels, who have been obliged to air locally made content. An easy dollar for producers and many of those involved. Continue reading.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail