Mayday flies into Season 15

I’m always conflicted about watching an episode of Mayday. I’m fascinated by how airplanes work and the unfortunate circumstances that bring them down, but I also love to fly, so seeing a flaming ball of wreckage on a runway sends shivers up my spine. Of course, the point of Mayday‘s real stories isn’t just to focus on the accidents themselves but how such incidents go a long way to improving airplane safety.

Season 15 kicks off Friday at 10 p.m. ET on Discovery with “Fatal Transmission,” the tale of a fiery collision between a United Express commuter flight and a small private plane in Quincy, Ill., that leaves investigators flummoxed. Did the fact the pilot and first mate had been working for 12 hours straight figure into what happened? Did having no flight attendant present during the 20-minute jaunt contribute to the death toll? Have pre-recorded in-cabin safety instructions become merely background noise?

Throughout the course of the episode, the impact multiple takeoffs and landings have on a flight crew, the common practice of letting first mates control the bulk of a flight to acquire hours of experience, and a lack of air traffic control at small airports are all offered as possible reasons for what occurred next: a deadly conflagration that claimed 14 lives.

Mayday‘s strength in storytelling remains the eyewitness accounts, and that continues Friday as flight instructor Paul Walker provides a dramatic and tragic account of what happened. Heartrending news footage continues the story until the National Transportation Safety Board and lead investigator Tom Haueter arrives. It doesn’t take long until the shocking reasons for the accident are revealed.

Mayday airs Fridays at 10 p.m. ET on Discovery.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Link: Degrassi’s enduring popularity proves teenagers will never get tired of their honest reflection

From David Berry of The National Post:

Degrassi’s enduring popularity proves teenagers will never get tired of their honest reflection
A quarter-century later, though, it’s hard not to see that as its best feature. Where 90210 has been lost in a sea of both fictional and “reality” descendants, each one grasping at ever-more histrionic reveals, Degrassi continues to plug away. The latest iteration, Degrassi: Next Class, debuts this Friday on Netflix, where, if history is any guide, it’s likely to stick around for a long time. The beauty of Degrassi is that it keeps getting older, but teen problems stay the same age. Continue reading.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Link: Saving Hope writers preview an important test for Alex and Charlie

From Bridget Liszewski of The TV Junkies:

Saving Hope writers preview an important test for Alex and Charlie
“We were writing Season 4 as if it were the last season. When we found out we were renewed, we cracked some celebratory beers and then immediately got to work completely overhauling the last few episodes of Season 4. Luckily for us, our fearless leader [showrunner] Adam Pettle is quick on his feet and cooked up a new killer ending that’s even better than the one we had. You guys are going to love it.” Continue reading.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Link: Myth Buster: A Possible New Series

From Jim Bawden:

Myth Buster: A Possible New Series
It’s simply time for CBC-TV to order a full season of Myth Or Science. The fourth in this irregular series on The Nature Of Things comes up Thursday night at 8 on CBC. And once again the photogenic Dr. Jennifer Gardy is in total command as she tackles all the myths we’ve ever heard about the weather.

Like its three predecessors this hour is jam packed with great visuals and Gardy’s fantastic TV presence –she has the scientific credentials but is also aware of what she has to do on TV to keep us interested. Continue reading.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Dr. Jennifer Gardy, weather mythbuster

Who has seen the wind? Dr. Jennifer Gardy, that’s who.

In the name of science — and her hosting role in tonight’s The Nature of Things — she steps into the eye of a (man-made) tornado, winds swirling around her, to discover whether a highway overpass is a safe place to hide. She also investigates if a plane would survive a lightning strike and if snow is really white.

For the episode “Myth or Science: In the Eye of the Storm,” Vancouver resident Gardy also travelled to Manchester to study rain, which seems like travelling from Edmonton to Anchorage to study snow, but that’s a perk of the gig:  visiting experts wherever they are in order to get answers.

“We follow the science, and more importantly we follow the scientists themselves,” says Gardy, explaining they want to capture the thought process of those scientists who were integral to deepening our understanding of the science behind weather phenomena.

Ironically Manchester – the Vancouver of the UK in terms of rain – was dry for all but about an hour during the six days the crew was filming there.

For one crucial shot, Gardy stood  in an alley while the director stood on a railway bridge above with a watering can. For others,  they desperately drove around Manchester in a van chasing the rain.  “As soon as it would start raining we’d slam the brakes on, throw open the door, everyone would run out onto the street and we’d get set up and get the shot, praying it would rain long enough for us to get a single take.”

That segment brought her the biggest surprise. “If you ask a child to draw a raindrop, or you ask an adult to draw a raindrop, they’ll draw that teardrop shape,” she says. “We’ve been lied to all these years.  The outline of a raindrop is more like a flattened out hamburger.”

Gardy is a researcher herself, with a day job studying the genome of infectious diseases with the BC Centre for Disease Control — a growth industry, you have to think, given the rise of superbugs.  She jokingly compares her methods to CSI, except it’s Cootie Scene Investigation.  “I try to find out from clues left in an organism’s genome things like where did that pathogen come from, how did it suddenly jump into this population, how did it cause this outbreak, how did it infect person A who infected B who infected C.”

Gardy2

Given that background, how does she approach her The Nature of Things segments knowing the audience is coming in without her background knowledge of the scientific process and the science itself? She says it’s important to consider the narrative arc they want the story to take before filming, and put on her “naive-to-the-subject-matter hat” when questioning the experts.

Gardy is a passionate communicator on and off-screen, melding her loves of performing and science.  “The biggest thing we can do as scientists is to communicate our work to the public,” she says. “The simplest reason is that we are obliged to.”

She points out much of the research being done in Canada is publicly funded. “The happy side effect of communicating that is the public realizes just how much it surrounds us in our everyday lives. People develop a greater appreciation for science and a greater appreciation for the role it plays in society.”

She points to the last election where people may not have been swayed by the science issue alone but “packaged with a bunch of other sweeping changes you have people saying wow, I’m really excited to support a government that supports science.”

That in turn creates a better climate for researchers active today and “more importantly, for the researchers of tomorrow. You can show kids that science is everywhere. Science isn’t a guy with crazy white hair and a lab coat with beakers full of coloured liquids.”

“Science is people who look like you and me. We come in every gender, we come in every colour, we come in every shape and size, we come in every research domain.”

“Science is all about thinking and observing and being curious. If we can raise a generation who keeps that curiosity and recognizes that everyone can be a scientist, we’ll get an awesome next generation.”

“Myth or Science: In the Eye of the Storm” airs tonight on CBC’s The Nature of Things.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail