Tag Archives: CBC

This Life’s Louis Ferreira: “David has something to prove”

Louis Ferreira has been a near-constant presence on our TV and film screens for decades, appearing in everything from Stargate Universe to Breaking Bad to Saw IV , but he doesn’t talk to the press much.

“I usually don’t do a lot of these,” he admits.

That’s a shame, because from the moment the Portuguese-Canadian actor answers his cell phone on a busy Vancouver street—his warm, gravelly voice instantly familiar—he is open and charming, talking easily about spirituality and politics before we get to the crux of our chat: discussing his role as Natalie’s (Torri Higginson) ex-husband David on the CBC family drama, This Life.

David, a deadbeat dad who only resurfaced once he learned his ex-wife had terminal cancer, could have been a thankless role for any actor to take on. But Ferreira says he was eager to play the part.

“I think what David represents is something that I believe in strongly, which is fathers doing right by their children, ultimately,” he explains.

He also says This Life is a hallmark for what Canadian TV is capable of.

“I was actually impressed with what CBC and Canada have done,” he says. “It’s a very well-done show. I was really proud to be part of it, to be honest.”

In an exclusive interview, Ferreira, who also has a recurring role on Space’s Aftermath, tells us more about David’s motivations, his working relationship with Torri Higginson, and wrapping popular CTV series Motive earlier this year.

How did you first become involved with This Life?  
Louis Ferreira: I think we had someone on the first season of Motive that knew me and asked about me, I think, through Kristin Lehman and was like, ‘What’s he like?’ and she was like, ‘Nice.’ I think that’s kind of where it started, and then from there the part came to me. And there was just that last episode of the first season, where [the creators of This Life] were like, ‘If it goes, there’s going to be a journey with him.’ Based on what they were telling me about the character, the ex who comes back, I was like, ‘Oooh.’ There are certain things that speak to me personally, and David was one of those stories. I was immediately interested, I was all over it, to be honest.

What were your early impressions of David, who is a character who comes with a lot of baggage?
I never thought of it as a guy with baggage, which is something we all have in all degrees of weight, but there was the opportunity to redeem. I love redemption. I love evolution. I love the idea of people coming to epiphanies in their lives and then changing them. I love the u-turn, and that’s what I saw in David right from the get-go, that this man had had some version of an epiphany and was going to come back and do right by his children because he acknowledged that he’d done wrong by them.

When I spoke with Torri Higginson earlier in the season, she said she was upset when she learned David was coming back into Natalie’s life.
I think that’s why Torri and I work together well. We’ll have discussions on set before we roll. It’s kind of a he said, she said, and she’ll state her piece, ‘Well, he did this,’ and I’ll be like, ‘Yes, but she….’ and it becomes almost like a therapy session before we shoot the scene. And we’ve done it several times, and it’s been very helpful, I think, for both of us because we’re able to see and feel each other’s hearts on the situation, and I think it informs the scene sometimes.

So you have a very interactive approach to your scenes together?
Yeah, for sure. I think absolutely we do. And I think we’re both journeymen in the business, and I think there is immediately a respect for that aspect of it, and I think we both sort of immediately connected because she was so rooted in that feeling of what she had going in, that, ‘Why is he coming back?’ and I felt that right away. For me, it was like, not only am I going to come back, but I’m going to prove to you that evolved potential that you saw back in the day that I probably could have been, I now have, in fact, become . . . David’s got something to prove.

Do you think David would have eventually returned on his own if Romy hadn’t called him last season to tell him Natalie was sick?
Yes. I think that the timing with Natalie’s illness, I’d like to imagine that it wasn’t about that, but it was the coincidence of where David got to in his life and how the universe sometimes works in people’s lives, where timing sometimes lines up. Sometimes it’s neither good nor bad, it’s just what it is. I think in this particular case, it was the trigger. I think when he got the phone call from Romy, it was certainly the thing that made him go, ‘OK, that’s a sign and I need to listen to it,’ because he was at that point in his life. So that’s probably what kickstarted it, but certainly going back was something that was on his agenda for quite a while. It’s something that he had to do.

It’s interesting to think about [David’s] younger kids and the older kids in terms of that whole thing of when we’re kids and we fall and it’s like, ‘Oh, no big problem,’ and we get back up. But as we get older, it gets harder and harder. It’s almost the same thing that the youngest of his children is able to be more, perhaps, forgiving, be more open, which is a really beautiful quality. But then as life happens, and egos age and get more jaded, it’s more difficult to do those very things that we did when we were younger, which is to forgive easily and love easier.

I think David has a real soft spot for Romy, because I think he can see with her the hurt that’s inside there, and I don’t think that would make any man—who’s a real man—feel good about himself, and I think that also drives David.

This Life 204

Last week, David’s second wife, Kate, tells him that she won’t move back to Montreal, which means he’ll have to try to be a father to two families in two locations. Is that something he is capable of now?
David, back in the day, was probably under the bad boy category, so I think now he’s probably some version of a reformed bad boy. But now I think he’s gone into a whole other level, as we do when we get older, and hopefully you get a little bit more into a context of spirituality or things that matter more to you. I like what they wrote in the car, I think he said to Kate, ‘The reality is that I’m always going to love the mother of my children. That doesn’t go away. She’s the mother of my children. How could I not?’ That’s a mature statement.

The other thing I liked about it, about [Natalie] being the mother of my children and me having another family, is that also becomes [Kate’s] responsibility, and it should have been from the get-go. When people with kids move into another relationship, it’s absolutely crucial that they understand that their children come first in a certain way, and they are part of it. It’s not just my moral responsibility, it’s the responsibility of the person who wants to share my life with me. It’s also on them, and that’s true partnership in terms of a healthy relationship. So David is now going, ‘OK, this is healthy, and this is not. And I will choose to be healthy or at least try.’

Just a couple of episodes ago, Natalie and David kind of had that one thing that happened, that one-off [where they sleep together], and you just sit there going, ‘Wait a minute, that’s not good.’ That probably shouldn’t have happened. And I loved that fact that it happened and was never mentioned again, and it’s our imperfections that make things interesting. But at the same time, I do believe that, in his heart, David is trying to do and wanting to do right by his children first and his families. And in this particular case, this is a man with two families.

Motive ended its four-year run in August. Were you happy with the way the series wrapped?
We just had the greatest group of people for four years. It was one big family, and we’re all still very, very close. It couldn’t have been a more enjoyable experience. Truly. From top to bottom, it was just one of those things where everything was right.

Do you keep in touch with the cast?
I just saw Kristin two days ago. We went out for coffee, and she’s just onto a new show now, a big show coming out next year, and she’s doing well, and Brendan [Penny]’s doing great, and I just talked to Lauren [Holly] yesterday, so we’re all tight. But beyond the cast, with that crew—it was just one of those things where everything was just easy and right and no egos and just working together. It was one of those rarities, and we’re all grateful for it.

This Life airs Sundays at 9 p.m. on CBC.

Images courtesy of CBC.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Photo gallery: First look at CBC’s Workin’ Moms

The last couple of months have been crazy at TV, Eh? On top of bringing you the latest Canadian television news, reviews and polls, we’ve hit the road for several set visits, including CBC’s upcoming Workin’ Moms.

Created and starring Catherine Reitman, the half-hour comedy focuses on four women who are struggling to keep their feet in the rat race while bringing up infants and dealing with postpartum depression, new job opportunities and unplanned pregnancy. With a cast that includes Dani Kind, Juno Rinaldi, Jessalyn Wanlim, Philip Sternberg and Wynonna Earp‘s Katherine Barrell, here’s a first look at the key cast.

[slideshow_deploy id=’37808’]

 

Workin’ Moms debuts Tuesday, Jan. 10, at 9:30 p.m. on CBC.

Images courtesy of CBC.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Link: Interview with Shoot the Messenger producers Sudz Sutherland and Jennifer Holness

From Koliah Bourne of Shifter:

Link: Interview with Shoot the Messenger producers Sudz Sutherland and Jennifer Holness
“We are looking at how we can bring humanity to our characters. You know let’s understand why they’re doing this, and also let us understand our own perception, such that when we see these things, what do we think? It probably looks more complicated than the show looks but that’s the kind of thinking that we were doing when we’re creating this.” Continue reading.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Shoot the Messenger goes boom

The last couple of episodes of Shoot the Messenger have been slow burns as momentum has worked up through dramatic tension to the inevitable explosive finale. Hassan has been trying to control the situation around the cell phone while Daisy, Simon and Lutz have dug for more information on Harry while the noose around Lawson tightened.

Monday’s newest, “News Travels Fast” by Ian Barr and directed by Gary Harvey, set off two explosive charges on the storylines.

In the first, Hassan has apparently tumbled off the Scarborough Bluffs, possibly to his death. After thwarting all attempts Phil Hardcastle has made to this point, it looks like his luck has run out. He’d secured $50,000 from Daisy and a rival newspaper for the video of Khaalid and Sam, but chose to gloat next to the cliffs. It would appear Phil finally found him. But I have my suspicions that Hassan is OK; folks are pulled from the Bluffs by emergency services all the time and Lutz is down on the beach so it makes sense he’ll be all right.

Not so OK? Sam Charles. Daisy tossed a verbal grenade into his lap by outright questioning his relationship with Khaalid. I have no idea how Sam is going to answer it—that will come next week—but I’m sure it will further estrange the Channing sisters. Not that they were doing all that well relationship-wise. Though their birthday dinner with Henry did have a precious few feel-good moments, it was marred by bitterness and old emotions.

And, unfortunately, emotions got the better of Lutz and Daisy, who went from a quick makeout scene in his car following the dead-end that was Harry to slow bout of lovemaking back at his place. I couldn’t help but giggle inappropriately at Harvey’s choice of visuals while Lutz and Daisy romped: tools screwed bugs into Lawson’s office and were inserted into his car. Sometimes, the symbolism is obvious.

Shoot the Messenger airs Mondays at 9 p.m. on CBC.

 

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Mary Pedersen dishes on Murdoch Mysteries’ “Painted Ladies”

The television industry is full of instances where someone scored a dream gig during their last interview. That’s certainly the case for Mary Pedersen. She’d left her family behind in Nova Scotia to pursue a writing job in Ontario, but was frustrated by meetings that went nowhere.

She gave her agent an ultimatum: one last meeting and she was going back home. That final interview? It was for Murdoch Mysteries. Suffice it to say, things worked out for Pedersen, who took time to talk about her latest episode of Murdoch Mysteries, and to tease next week’s instalment.

Can you give me some backstory into how the main thrust of the murder came about? I’ll never be able to look at swan boats the same way again.
Mary Pedersen: I think it was even before we started work in the room before Season 10 that [showrunner] Peter Mitchell had sent around a story about Victorian flirtation cards and we were riffing on what kind of trouble the constables would get into with these cards. It stuck with us and made it onto the board and I was really glad to get the assignment because I thought it was fun and I tend to gravitate to romantic stories.

Aside from the murder of Mr. Fellowes, there was a lot of big stuff going on with Nina and Crabtree. It was very saucy to have them in bed together at 8 p.m. on CBC and a shirtless Jonny Harris!
[Laughs.] That’s what happens when you have women writers, I guess. We’re always doing a balance between old-timey and present-day and I think it’s always interesting to look at the past through the lens of today. When I look at a story like this I think, ‘Well, what’s the reality of it?’ People were having sex. There is this Victorian sensibility that people weren’t having sex and if they were it was only if they were married, and even then it was only in the missionary position. I don’t think that’s true and that’s kind of where I was coming from when I did that.

murdoch2

You’re not only showing the advancement of thinking in Toronto in 1904 but also the growth of this relationship. I think this is the most passionate relationship Crabtree has been in.
It’s interesting. I think when Nina’s character was conceived the idea was that she is a different kind of person and has thought a lot about sexuality and is up front about it. That’s an interesting contrast with the rest of our characters. The chemistry between Nina and Crabtree is great and it feels natural that their relationship is progressing. Erin Agostino has great charisma and I liked seeing that part of their relationship on screen because it’s fun to see Jonny do something a little more dramatic.

Is it important for the writers to have Jonny be in relationships on Murdoch, or does it not matter if he’s single?
Speaking for myself, I always want to see him in a relationship. I think he does great work in those situations. With Ogden and Murdoch now married and at a different stage in their relationship, Jonny is one of those places where we can see the earlier stages of love and have that tension of will they or won’t they?

And then there is Higgins, who is more awkward than Jackson when it comes to interacting with ladies.
[Laughs.] I wasn’t sure how it was going to go, but I loved that flip where Higgins is always so cocky and not self-aware and that turn where he says, ‘The problem is, I always do’ … Lachlan hit that out of the part and I think I almost cried the first time. Like, ‘Oh, sweetie.’ [Laughs.] It was really fun to have that insight into him and, for me, changed my perspective on him.

Let’s talk a bit about the scene between Murdoch and Mrs. Fellowes.
It was Linzee Barclay who played the widow, and I had a lot of fun writing her character and then the actress they found was just fantastic. I love the idea that the smartest person in the room is confronted with the person that thinks they are the smartest person in the room.

We’re constantly seeing the tie-ins between back then and now, and the flirtation cards were like Twitter and Facebook.
Yeah, we were thinking of it as the Tinder of the time. I think it was a big trend a little earlier than this and there were editorials about what a dangerous thing flirtation was. The point of the cards was to meet away from your chaperone and break the Victorian rules of proper courting.

Was it true that lip rouge, at the time, was viewed as being wicked?
Yes, it was becoming more common but it would have been controversial and some people wouldn’t have worn it at all.

What about tapeworms and nose jobs?
I saw magazine articles for tapeworms as a way to lose weight and this was right around the time of the very first nose job. The truest line that I wrote about that was, ‘Oh Oscar, that’s impossible the scars would be so great.’ If you look at the picture of the first person to have a nose job, it wasn’t a pretty sight. It’s definitely fudged that she would be able to hide it and go undetected.

That’s 1904 and in 2016 body image is still top of mind.
When you look at articles about cosmetics at the time, or a little earlier, white skin was very popular and wearing powder was very important. The mere fact that they wore corsets says a lot about looking a certain way.

What can you tell me about Episode 8?
It’s going to be one of the funniest episodes, I think, of the season and a good mystery too. It features one of the writers’ room’s most favourite guest characters of all.

Murdoch Mysteries airs Mondays at 8 p.m. on CBC.

Images courtesy of CBC.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail